Talk:Eve Angel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

[edit] "Official site"

The official site is nothing more than a subscription porn site. It provides little to no detail on Eve Angel. I propose that it be removed. --malber 11:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. --Fang Aili 00:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree. And I think it should be noted that if links to nonworksafe sites, or those that some might find offensive, are included, there's nothing wrong with a neutrally worded warning. We're not saying "don't click it"; we're saying "we care about all our readers' sensibilities". Grace Note 01:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My website removed?

Why did you remove my website guys? I am working hard doing my model agency and my own website, finally I reached the point in my life when I can be my own boss, and you are removing my links I have put so much work into? If this is an informational page about me, please leave my official website linked in, because this is what I am doing every day (and every weekend) if this is page not related to me (my website IS!) then please remove the whole Wikipedia article. Thank you! Love, Eve XXX

Eve, please note that Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself or your website. As much as it pleases me that you are a hard working individual, with your own modeling agency and opportunities ahead of you, members of the community elected to not include your links on the bio page. Should they choose to reverse their decision, we would be more than happy to link to the three pages that you added. In the meantime, due to already established consensus, they will be removed. If you have any questions, please let any one of us know. Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 04:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I have a personal blog/news page on my site and also a forum that I post to daily - what is this if it's not up to date information about me? Sorry guys I don't agree with your decision. Eve

I don't really see anything wrong with linking to her official site, it's perfectly legitimate information about her. As far as it being inappropriate - most people who end up on her Wikipedia page are probably going to be OK with the consequences brought forth by going to a pay-porn site. This is sort of a gray area in Wikipedia's policy, and I don't think that simply linking to a www.person'sname.com website, from their own Wikipedia biography page, constitues advertising.Youaredj 07:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

well she IS a porn star, so what do you expect on her site. this is a strange behavior

But i think why should be like at normal articles of famous people there an link 2 the official website? She is a porn star so everybody can imagine that this is a website of a pornstar and that this page is a little bit different then normal pages. --134.147.29.188 22:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)