User talk:Evadb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Knight Bachelor Insignia
Good job. Please would you colour it? - Kittybrewster 09:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Revert
Wiki does have a policy about using revert Please try to follow the rules like the rest of us. Alci12 23:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Posting a comment on the talk would have done the job
- As to the issue it is that in articles with long lists of office holders people may read to the bottom or go straight to the bottom (as I did) then decide to click on the incumbent. Yet what you find is you have to go all the way back to the top. It seemed a fair exception to the general rule of not repeating links to have the present holder linked at the bottom as well. Failing that the bottom seems the most obvious place and the other articles seem to follow that pattern so removing the top link would have been more consistent Alci12 23:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] St John Orders
Thanks for your discussion on other pages about restructuring the St John Order articles. I'm not sure if you saw my suggestions there. How about something with an article for each of these. This would cover the St John Orders, and similar structure could be given to the Lazarite Orders.
- Alliance of Orders of St John
-
- Order of Malta
- The Four Main Protestant Orders
- Balley Brandenburg ("Johanniterorden")
- Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem
- Johanniterorden I Sverige
- Johanniter Orde in Nederland
- The Four non-German Commanderies of the Bailiwick of Brandenburg
- Swiss Commandery of the Order of St John
- French Commandery of the Order of St John
- Hungarian Commandery of the Order of St John
- Finnish Commandery of the Order of St John
If we had an article for each of the starred items, that should cover the topic pretty well. The origins of the Hospitaller Orders in general could either be covered under the SMOM or possibly under the alliance. Thanks! --dave-- 14:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Donald Bradman
I'm surprised by your cite request. I don't think you'll find a single cricket source published since World War Two that would say anything different. --Dweller 09:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- After some brief chat on the talk page there, I came up with the idea of finding a source that said that Bradman is universally acclaimed. The source is now included in the article. Thanks! --Dweller 13:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- You might also be interested to see why such an apparently POV tag is appropriate. Bradman's dominance of cricket far exceeds Michael Jordan's in basketball - there's a statistical comparison at Donald Bradman#Context. --Dweller 13:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Heraldry re Lyon etc
Using both college and court or Kings is certainly better than using one of each which just looked indecisive. I've wikified so we have easy access to the sources Alci12 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)