Talk:ENFP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 February 2006. The result of the discussion was redirect to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

I'm not sure that this should be just a redirect. I've commented about this on the MBTI talk page and called for consistency in the way we treat the different types. They should really either all be articles (or stubs until more detailed articles get written) or else they should all redirect to the MBTI page. Given that ISTP and INFJ already have articles about them I don't see why the same can't be true of other types. Jammycakes 21:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I disagree, too. The article should not be deleted. JKW 14:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

ENFPs rule!! Grover cleveland 05:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Type Descriptions

I just deleted the descriptions on all of these personality types. A lot of them were copyvios from different sources, several of them being from http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/ , where they may or may not have been copied from other locations. Nonetheless, the three theories of MBTI, Keirsey Temperaments, and Socionics are quite different and require different descriptions of types, functions, relations, and other concepts. Socionics especially differs from the other two. The three theories should all be expanded upon in Wikipedia, but it is impossible to do this while there is a conglomeration of these three theories and they are treated as one and the same. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


this is the description of the INFP, not ENFP, as found on http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/n/f/Talk%7EENFP_21a9.html"