From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
We are always looking for new members! Join us today!
|
|
|
This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Is it only me, or does the tone of this article strike others as completely unencyclopedic as well?
How so? It provides a basic summary of the film, though it doesn't cover the entire thing (and I plan on fixing that after I rent and watch it again) and I don't notice anything against the neutrality. Just because it's a Wikipedia article doesn't mean people can't inject some form of style into their writing, if that's what you're saying. I might see where you're coming from, given that some of the phrases are a bit inappropriate: i.e. "blown to bits". Whampir 18:52, 14 April 2006 (UTC)