User talk:Emt147

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Archives of the earlier talk pages can be found here:

Contents

[edit] ?

How do i join wikiproject:aircraft?--Signor Pastrini 03:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Non-breaking spaces

Although I understand the benefit of non-breaking spaces, they are not a big deal for me. Right now, I prefer not to increase the scope of my work to include them. Sorry about that.

However, I have edited my unit formatting script and invite you to take it and make it your own. Simply follow the two steps:

winc('User:Emt147/monobook.js/units_nbsp.js');

Also, please use the dates tab on articles you edit, articles in your watchlist, in categories of interest to you and elsewhere.

I would be more than happy to advise you on amendments.

Keep up the good work. bobblewik 09:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I have something you may want

I recently found I had two copies of "The Martin B-26 Marauder: A Bibliography and Guide to Research Sources" by Esther Oyster and John O. Moench. As I know you are active in aviation history articles and the B-26 Marauder article in particular, I figured i'd offer it up to you. Hit me back if your interested.  ALKIVAR™ 04:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RNZAF P-40 footnotes

Thanks for your help - all referenced up now :-).

[edit] Lyulka AL-7

In the Lyulka AL-7 article you mention that the engine has supersonic flow in the compressor. Can you provide any more details on this? I was under the impression that supersonic compressors were still entirely experimental; the last time I asked was about a decade ago and a guy from NASA state this. Maury 19:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I found your userpage had been vandalized today so I took the liberty of restoring it. And updating your little userbox to reflect your fourth vandalism. The second edit was because when I restored your page I accidently formatted it incorrectly. And I'm about to warn the vandal. LWF 02:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem. LWF 03:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Douglas XP-48.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Douglas XP-48.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help Please?

In contacted you a couple a days ago, but you must have missed my message. Anyway, I was just curious on how I could join WikiProject: Aircraft. Could you please provide an answer on my talk page, thanks!--Signor Pastrini 23:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aircraft engine

Did you ever re-write the Aircraft engine article? You laft a message on the talk page in February of 2006 saying that you would re-write it. If you have, please remove the clean-up message. Thanks, --Weatherman1126 (talk) 14:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Klimov VK-1

Hi,

Can you give a source for your additions concerning british technology transfer, and russian metallurgy problems? Thank you Carstenrun 21:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick answer. Carstenrun

[edit] Merges and a question about your migration task list

I'm getting ready to do a couple of merges (C-6 Ute and U-21 Ute into the Beechcraft King Air), and in checking the "what links here", I came across your migration task list. Not knowing exactly what that is, I thought I'd check to make sure I'm not gonna mess up something you're working on before doing the merges. As an aside, given your username, are you an EMT in real life? (I work for a medevac provider, which is why I'm asking). Thanks! Akradecki 05:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] F-4

Hi, first of all i should warn you that one of the basic principles of wikipedia is to assume good will Wikipedia:Assume good faith. We are trying to help to project, not to harm. Your information is not correct, cause just check the site of Turkish Air Forces. You can see the technical details of the inventory. Furthermore, Turkish Army bought AIM-120 AMRAAM just for F-4's. I think there exits a spelling mistake in your source, "able" maybe falsely written as "unable". If you are insistent, tell me your references or sources. I'd like to check them, too. Thanx e104421 8:12. 4 September 2006 (UCT)

As i told you above, the web site is the official site of Turkish Air Forces, there you'll see the modernization details.e104421 03:55. 4 September 2006 (UCT)

[edit] sorry

I apologize for that, my friend (who made the copy of the page) told me to copy the history. I'm actually being more serious now and not vandilizing. Once again, my apologies.

[edit] Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—and wherever—you'd like:

  • Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
  • Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
  • Working on featured-level articles? We have some advice for nominators, and an A-Class review process to help check high-quality articles.
  • Want to help with specific requests for assistance? Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
  • Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 00:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] {{RAF Squadron}}

Might it be possible to deprecate {{RAF Squadron}} and use {{Infobox Military Unit}} instead? As far as I can tell, all the fields in the RAF template are available in the general one. Kirill Lokshin 03:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I highly doubt anyone would complain—or even notice—but WT:MILHIST is usually a good place for these sorts of discussions; I've raised the question [[WT:MILHIST#
Emt147
Active {{{dates}}}

|here]]. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 12:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not remove the quote from CNO Mullen

Regardless of what you think of USA Today, Michael Mullen is a reputable source and a quote from him about a naval airplane is legitimate content for the F-14 Tomcat article. 66.167.139.50 19:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC).

[edit] "HAL Tejas" Assessment

Thanks for taking the time to assess the HAL Tejas article, but "Better but still needs a lot of work, including English, readability, NPOV, citations, no editorializing, etc. etc. etc." is rather broad-brush. When you can spare some time, could you please take a few minutes to offer some more specific guidance? Since I'm still pretty new to Wikipedia, I've been using the WP Aircraft grading scheme examples for guidance and the F-35 Lightning II for the peak standard, and these appear to be no longer representative of current grading standards. Appreciatively, Askari Mark | Talk 01:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. Can you recommend a good example to emulate? I've taken the time to read through all of the Aircraft FA- and A-class articles and cannot say I'm very impressed. When I get the time, I'm going to look through non-Aircraft articles for better guidance, but since you're a much more experienced Wikepedian than I, you're more likely to already be familiar with some real top-notch examples. Cheers, Askari Mark | Talk 02:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dispute resolution needed about the F-14 article

Please refer to Talk:F-14 Tomcat for a response to comments you made there, particular these comments from you about the need for arbitration:

  • This is in gross violation of WP:NPOV. Claims made by one man are given undue weight and are clearly used by the anonymous user to advance his or her giddy fanboyism of the aircraft. I will continue to revert this addition mercilessly -- if you think it belongs, call for an arbitration now (23:51, 24 September 2006)
  • This is a PR quote of no encyclopedic value and I will revert it. If you disagree, call arbitration. This conversation is over. (18:13, 28 September 2006)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Opinon

Would you please take a look at Talk:Charles de Gaulle (R 91)? We need some outside opinions on an ongoing dispute. Thanks. --BillCJ 18:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted user page?

There is a tag requesting speedy deletion of your Archive 2. There is only one edit. Is this an error or do you really want this deleted? --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/m/t/User_talk%7EEmt147_88d0.html"