User talk:Elven6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Archives
For the archived talk page please see the following If Admins have a problem with this please contact me.
--Elven6 02:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocking
I think I was blocked under a idea which is ludacris, just because I gave my opinion about somneones idea and contributed to a few articles doesn't meany you should call me a troll. People like Sukh and Ramas Arrow could be called trolls sinces all they do is stay at the Sikhism page.
16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Portal approval page
I noticed you presented a request for a Sega portal to be created, and a bunch of people voted down the idea. Well, there is no preapproval process for page creation on Wikipedia, so that page went beyond its authority. That page has been nominated for deletion, and the deletion discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Portal/Proposals. --Transhumanist
I didn't make it, I just started it and some other people took it over, although they never joined up they edited it and stuff.
I forgot their even was one!
[edit] WP:NPA block
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. . Duration=24 hours. --Ragib 17:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- I guess I'm late in arriving, but I'd have to say that I agree with Ragib.Blnguyen | rant-line 01:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- When you get blocked for making personal attacks, you shouldn't make more personal attacks immediately upon returning. You're blocked, again. Shall I make it an indefinite block? DS 23:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey listen that guy was harassing me, what could I DO, I had to snap at him for all the trouble hes been putting me through!
Ever since I cleared up some confusion on the Sikhism page hes been on my case, you should ban him too in that case for harassment!
Elven6 July
[edit] A tip
As a person who presents himself as a Sikh, you may find the following words by Guru Nanak from the Guru Granth Sahib insightful [1]
- ਨਾਨਕ ਫਿਕੈ ਬੋਲਿਐ ਤਨੁ ਮਨੁ ਫਿਕਾ ਹੋਇ ॥
- naanak fikai boliai than man fikaa hoe ||
- O Nanak, speaking insipid words, the body and mind become insipid.
Please refrain from using vile and insulting language - even when others do the same to you. You do nothing but discredit yourself. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 23:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey he was stalking me, and you know this true, I can't be blaimed for him provoking me can I?
Elven6 July 21 (UTC)
[edit] Severe civility issue
Elven, unfortunately your use of abusive language in talking to other editors has crossed a limit. You don't seem to learn from your blocks, which were imposed for a reason. Please do not request an article's "deletion" without understanding the criteria and procedure, and don't revert-war in articles.
I'm not stalking you as your edits are all on public display. There is no privacy or exclusiveness on Wikipedia, and don't you can get away by calling me a prick on on a different talkpage.
You have been requested, advised, warned and punished several times. You MUST understand that you are disrupting Wikipedia work and not helping others. I don't have a problem in accepting you as a regular contributor, but you must work respectfully. My advice is that you should apologize to Sukh and ARYAN818, because you have personally attacked them and its not a content/POV difference anymore. This Fire Burns Always 23:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
I never attacked Sukh! And I called Aryans idea Idiotic about Jatt being a Sikh caste system which it is not to a severe extent!
But YOU! Stop stalking my edits and harrasing me like this! You pretty much provoked all those attacks! And Aryan kept removing his Deletion tags and I was reverting that, and fyi a Administrator put it their!
Elven6
And Sukh you are pretty full of urself refering to your self like that, and I never attacked other users beside Aryan and Rama, but Rama deserved for provoking and stuff.
As for Aryan, that was on the Sikhism page which I left along time ago due to a few people their. And if your calling me a troll for not staying at one board 24/7 then what would that make the 2 of you?
- Referring to myself as what exactly? You fail to understand that it's not acceptable to attack any user, for any reason. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 23:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
My reasons are my own but that dosen't make it acceptable for him to Stalk me like that!
Elven6 July 21 (UTC)
[edit] Ban
So how longs it up for? If you need reasons just look through this page! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elven6 (talk • contribs).
Elven6
- In response to your extremely uncivil and vulgar messages left in my talk page (see this]), I endorse your indef block. So far, you've been blocked several times for personal attacks and incivility, but you are yet to learn to behave yourself. --Ragib 00:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Elven, I've reverted your racist comment, and if you continue your behavior, I'd be forced to protect this talk page as well. --Ragib 00:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
How was that Racist? I myself am brow? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elven6 (talk • contribs).
- Is it not possible to discriminate against someone of your own race? Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 00:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Um not really not in my cases, thats like asking my African Americans refer to each other using the N word, they accept it when one of their own say it.
Elven6 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elven6 (talk • contribs).
-
- Funny...in all my years as an Indian, I can't recall being called, or calling any one else "Brown." Perhaps Coolie is the word you were looking for, but even that is just used for porters, not in any racial sense by us. I can't say anybody's gonna miss you around here, but I wish you the best of luck in life and hope you'll learn something in terms of the need to change your behavior and shed this anger. If you are given another chance, I hope you'll start afresh as a different person. This Fire Burns Always 01:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
So when is this ban over? You can't just ban someone and not tell them for how long! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elven6 (talk • contribs).
- According to the block log, your block is indefinite. I do endorse this as you have continued to show belligerent attitudes to other users, and have engaged in racist comments and personal attacks. Unless you promise to change your behavior, this block should stay. Thanks. --Ragib 19:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Apologie
Im sorry for what I have done, I have realized I was in the wrong for snapping at Rama like that no matter how badly he needed it. I aplogize to all who had to take time out of their scedules to solve this disupute. Again I am sorry.
Elven6 July 2006 (UTC)
Is anyone even reciveing this msg? Its not showing up on Recent Changes for some reason--Elven6 16:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hundreds of edits occur on Wikipedia every minute, so it's unlikely it'll show up in Recent Changes. Please be patient because other people are in different time zones and so may not respond as fast as you like. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 18:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Okay
You seem to be sincerely sorry. I have rescinded the block.
Do not make me reinstate it. DS 22:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Im trying to edit but it dosent let me, it says im still banned --Elven6 22:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Log out, clear your cache, and retry. You are not blocked right now. --Ragib 01:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
How do I clear my cache? --Elven6 02:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Ok I reset my wiki account, I renewed my IP address, I flushed my DNS, I reregisterd my DNS, I cleared my cookies, I logged out/loggined into my account, and it still isn't working.
--Elven6 02:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Can someone come to a solution to this error?
--Elven6 22:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I've reblocked and unblocked you again to see if this removes your block. It should work now, check and let us know. --Ragib 00:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Their we go that fixed the problem, well I made a promise so im gonna stick to it --Elven6 00:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Culture of China
I'm pretty sure that Sikhism isn't a big part of Chinese culture. I suppose there must be a small Sikh community in HK, but I don't know if that qualifies Sikhism to be listed under the banner of religions in China. -Easytoremember 03:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
wow. where in china have you exactly been? there's huge numbers of muslims. they're called uighurs and hui. if you haven't seen large numbers of them, it's because you have probably spent about three days in Hong Kong, where, it's true, there aren't proportionally just loads of muslims. Look at the demographics of China article. -Easytoremember 01:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
i didn't want a user page. be careful about that stuff. now i can't get rid of it... christ. -Easytoremember 01:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey I needed a way to contact you, I though I was posting in the discussions page but this Wiki system gets confusing.
Sorry --Elven6 01:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aerowings dcboxboxart 160w.jpg)
 |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Aerowings dcboxboxart 160w.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 13:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:B865.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:B865.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
