Template talk:ELVs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Rename?
The SpaceX Falcons are not technically ELVs, seeing as they are re-usable, and the whole meaning of the term "ELV" denotes that the rocket in question is not reusable.
Therefore, I suggest that the template is renamed to cover all rockets capable of launching satellites into orbit. This would also allow the Space Shuttle, and other re-usable launchers to be included. --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | Chess | E-mail 19:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
(OPPOSE)--aceslead 03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was No consensus, default Not moved. —Centrx→talk • 02:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Template:ELVs → Template:LVs – Prevent disputes about Semi-ELVs, make template cover all Satellite Launch Vehicle articles, not just expendable ones. This would allow it to cover the Space Shuttle, and the SpaceX Falcons (the latter are already, incorrectly, included) to name a few. GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | Chess | E-mail 21:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
(OPPOSE)--aceslead 03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
I already removed partially reusable launch vehicles from the template. I think that a template for Reusable launch vehicles and Partially reusable launch vehicles should be created.--aceslead 03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Ares and Falcon
Please stop adding Ares to the "in development" section. It is partially reusable, and therefore not an ELV. Falcon does not qualify either --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 19:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
