Talk:Egmont (play)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

The music section is very interesting, but the timing highly depends on the version of recording. Wouldn't it be better to indicate bar numbers, or at least the exact recording the timing is based upon ? Chris CII 11:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Chris CII

That makes sense - do you have the bar numbers? The whole lot is close to original research as it stands — it would improve with a reference to the analysis. --Scott Davis Talk 13:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Quote from the article: "[...] of great quality but a little disconnected"

Whose opinion is this? There are no sources cited and Wikipedia is not the place for original ideas.

[edit] Merge from Egmont (Beethoven)

RHaworth has suggested that the new article Egmont (Beethoven) be merged into the play. While I understand that they're joined works, I'm also of the opinion that they're both capable of standing on their own. I'd like to suggest leaving them separate. ~Kylu (u|t) 06:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/g/m/Talk%7EEgmont_%28play%29_3989.html"