Wikipedia talk:Editor review/Backburner001

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

User:backburner001 was completely wrong in his interpretations of my comments about User:Badlydrawnjeff I explained my comments on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Brian G. Crawford. I have so regarded backburner as an annoying pissant who is much more interested in wikilawyering and pushing policy in people's faces and making accusations of assuming bad faith here, there, and everywhere that I got sick of his dimwitted badgering and ignored him. If he would simply say what he thinks and why, he would have gotten some respect from me, but parroting policy and toeing the Wikipedia line makes me sick. Backburner needs to grow a pair of balls PDQ and ditch the passive-aggressive approach.

Cleveland steamer is nothing but a sex joke, and it has no place in an encyclopedia. I'd like to see sex topics treated with serious academic rigor, but as long as we have shit jokes like this, nobody is going to take this encyclopedia seriously.Brian G. Crawford 04:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/d/i/Wikipedia_talk%7EEditor_review_Backburner001_c3e5.html"