Wikipedia:Editor review/Tree Biting Conspiracy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:Tree Biting Conspiracy

Tree Biting Conspiracy (talk • contribs) I'm TBC and this is my second editor review. I've been around here for 9 months and have around 10,000 edits. I'm not currently an admin yet, but I do hope to become one in the future. It's been a while since my last editor review and I want some feedback now from the community on how I'm doing. TBCTaLk?!? 15:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

  • Hopefully I'm not just influenced by the fact you have a name I remember when I see it, but there's nothing you do which I find objectionable and a fair amount which I find very good indeed. We don't always agree when it comes to AfDs, but at least I know I'm disagreeing with a well-reasoned argument on the other side (as in the one here). Certainly nothing I can pick on to improve, so I guess "carry on as you were" is the bottom line here. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 07:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll agree with BigHaz, you look like you're doing just fine. Actually, strike that: OMG you are doing awesome. There, much better. :) I can think of no specific way you can improve your editing, but I s'pose you might try to raise an article or two to FA standard (assuming you haven't already...). Apart from that, rock on! Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 09:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll review you, if only to be at the receiving end of one of your infamous 'ackward attempts at humour' :p Seriously, though, you're doing brilliantly. A featured portal, and DYKs... that should charm the pants off even the crustiest RfA !voters. AfD participation... check. Talk and user talk... check. Gosh, the man's even got template edits. Funny looking sig... errr... yeah perhaps have a play around with it, I've seen lots of opposes based on sigs, might wanna make it a little shorter. I'm running out of things to quibble about, as you can tell. Keep up the good work! — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 17:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
  • The sysop tools would be very useful for you. I suggest that you apply for adminship -- Samir धर्म 01:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I would suggest you to follow Samir's suggestion. :-) --Húsönd 21:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I have seen you quite a lot of times in AFD's and you have a good knowledge of the rules and regulation . Go for adminship, you should easily get it. Most of the new admins just have around 5000 edits. You should do well.--Ageo020 (talk • contribs • count) 23:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • You seem to edit to an extremely high standard; your edit count in a short space of time is commendable to say the least. My primary suggestion is you run for admin - I'll be voting for you if you do, that's for sure! Also, your userpage layout is brilliant! Keep it up - you're an example to Wikipedians around the world! --Anthonycfc (Talk to Me) (sandbox) (E-Count) 01:44 16 Dec 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Portal:Food, which I got to featured status; as well as Planetary Fourier Spectrometer, Romanian wine, Jews in Japan, Super Robot Wars: Original Generation, and Thomas Highs which I've gotten on to DYK.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    As with most users, I have been in a few conflicts, many of which have already been resolved. These conflicts mostly involve merging/splitting articles, AfD nominations, and templates. Even so, no matter what the issue is, I've tried my best to remain civil throughout all of these conflicts.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/d/i/Wikipedia%7EEditor_review_Tree_Biting_Conspiracy_16c1.html"