Wikipedia:Editor review/TehKewl1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:TehKewl1

TehKewl1 (talk • contribs) I try, but I still fail, what do you think of me as an editor? TehKewl1 06:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

  • You always seem like a good person on IRC so I assume you're a good editor, too. Without checking your edits too much, it looks like you spend most of your time reverting, which is fake edits. So your editing is vandal fighting. Anomo 08:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • You seem to be, overall, contributing to Wikipedia in a good standard. However I notice you have recently made a personal attack on User:220.245.141.50 I think I've got those numbers right! which is not the standard of a good Wikipedian.
Otherwise, however, your editing is of high standard and you participate in lots of anti-vandal duties. Keep it up, and watch what you say!

--Anthonycfc (Talk to Me) (sandbox) (E-Count) 16:32 15 Dec 2006 (UTC)

  • Hello, TehKewl1, here is my review, hopefully it is useful for you.
    • Out of your little over 1000 contributions to Wikipedia, you have around 340 edits in user talk pages. That is well over 1/3 of your total contributions, quite a lot! It means you like to communicate with others individually, to question or reply to their inquiries or warn vandalism, and that you are a very straightforward person. It is obvious that you are a full patroller, as most of your edits are reverts and warnings.
    • This is something to worry about personally, you have only 4 edits in article talk pages, much less than 1% of your total edits. When you edit articles in Wikipedia, some other editors may not agree with your latest additions or removal. To express their opinion, they usually use the talk page. As the talk page is used by all the editors of the article, conversations there are public. Of course, when you spend a lot of time fighting vandals, you are likely to have less time to edit articles and converse with others about how to improve articles. But note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia before all, and while patrollers are good, they are also expected to contribute to the encyclopedia.
    Apparently, you are happy fighting vandals, something that is stressful as sometimes you are tired and end fighing fire with fire (as you have been warned in your talk page). That is why vandal fighters are encouraged to spend some time editing articles to relax themselves. You may consider that option to prevent future problems. Most vandals are newbies trying to have fun. You should also meet the newbies that are trying to become good editors. A visit to the New contributors' help page may help you meet newbies that are willing to learn. Also, consider giving a hand at Requests for adminship, there you may have the chance to see that, although appreciated, vandal fighters are also expected to contribute with articles. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 18:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Not Especially... some of my edit summaries crack me up though.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Yeah, I just recently made an immature remark on a users talk page after he made an immature edit to Nintendo. and now I have a warning, now I've learned my mistake and I promise to follow Don't be a dick in the future.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/d/i/Wikipedia%7EEditor_review_TehKewl1_6ed4.html"