Wikipedia:Editor review/I'll bring the food

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:I'll_bring_the_food

I'll_bring_the_food (talk • contribs) My time here always feels heated and frictiony (not sure that's even a word). Please suggest improvements for me. Also check out the additions i made to the human voice article. I'm chuffed how well i did there. I have a lot of problems with fan-boys and girls as i edit all the articles on singing. You might want to bear that in mind somewhat. I'll bring the food 00:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

• First of all, I suggest you to reply the answers below, even if that means repeating what you have posted above. Now, for a review.

  • Your edit usage is just fine, around 60% for major edits and 75% for minor edits. You should consider improving your edit summary usage, though, as you are doing recently, as they are extremely useful for other editors. It allows people to quickly find a revision by looking at the history of a page, and it allows others to spend less time checking your modifications in articles.
  • Now, you say you have problems with fanboys. While I have had problems with people as well, I try to remain civil as much as possible, as that improves the Wikipedia community. While vandalism is always bad, edits summaries like rvv - i've no idea who deleted all that text but a ban is clearly in order.^[1], yeah, but that isn't sourced so i'm assuming some nut job made it up.,^[2] and 60 million in your wildest dreams, in reality, 51 million. by the way DO NOT PUT CRAP IN THE ARTICLE USING THE MINOR EDIT TICK SO PEOPLE DON'T SEE IT.^[3] are highly uncivil and, if you continue, you may be blocked for uncivility and personal attacks.
  • Even worse, your attacks also cover good faithed edits (rm crap. Pop singers do NOT fit the weight categories given for them.,^[4]). If while trying to contribute they get back summaries like those, they may leave Wikipedia, and while you may be happy because that may mean "less fanboys to handle", the community will be losing a potential contributor.
  • With 170 edits in user talk pages and around 100 in article talk pages, they would usually be good numbers. However, as most of your summaries are highly controversial, I suggest you to spend more time discussing in talk pages, to learn that some editors try to contribute in good faith, and even if they are wrong, there are other ways of telling them they are mistaken.

  You have potential of being a good user, but your behaviour will bring you more stress and problems than satisfaction. Remember, this is a community-driven place, and unless you understand that we don't want to expel people but instead educate them, you will end up being blocked or even banned. I suggest you to take a break, think if you can educate instead of alienate, and return once you have decided if you will continue with this way, or you will change. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 21:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using a PHP version of Interiot's tool.

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   Answer

2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Answer