Wikipedia:Editor Review/Abcdefghijklm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:Abcdefghijklm

Abcdefghijklm (talk • contribs) Hi, I am looking to recieve a review on my current performance, so that I can see how other people think I am doing, and so that I can take on board advice on how I can improve my contribution. Although it might appear that I have little experience at the moment, I have been here for over 12 months as an IP. I got a username so I could commit more time to the fight against vandalism. I have no desire to become a sysop at the current time, but I have not ruled out this possibility for the future. Thanks for taking the time to look at my performance.

Reviews

• The user needs more experience to learn how to use templates. For example, I had to help the user do this (which I have no problem with), and I think the username is too long. Computerjoe's talk 18:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in setting this up, much appreciated, and I understand how to use the template now.Abcdefghijklm 20:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• • User name is too long? It's only two more characters than yours. —BorgHunter (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)

Questions

1. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I am pleased with my edits on the page Chester City Council some of these were done when I was editing as an IP. It involved me going through old council minutes and looking at the Council's website (www.chester.gov.uk). I built most of the election tables, and information on the cabinet and shadow cabinet.

2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I have been involved in a dispute over peerages. Details of this dispute can be found on my talk page, but in short, I was not involved as an editor, but had noticed on a recent edits patrol that there had been debate over the issue of using first names, and that the 3RR rule had been broken. I advised the users to reach a peaceful solution using the artice talk page. This advice was not taken, and the discussion spread on to my talk page. I felt I handled it well, and as far as I am aware, a compromise has been reached.