Talk:Ed Dames
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-05-12. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
Contents |
[edit] "Killshot"
If the kill shots are caused by the earth as a foreign object to the sun...maybe we should co-exist with the sun again and use the Mayan Calendar?
This kill shot is most likely going to be the one that'll bring modern society to it's knees. Think EMP on the most destructive possible scale, where not one thing that relies on electrical current surives, complete darkness ensues. -Az
[edit] aaroncdonahue.com
Ed Dames has crossed the line by being involved with the purchase of the domain "aaroncdonahue.com". This is clearly a scam in order to save himself. Shame on you Ed. Click here to read what Aaron Donahue has to say about this.
-
- There was a line?!?!?!
Yes, there in fact is a line. It seems like Christian Dames would follow the Golden Rule.
[edit] Ed Dames Accuracy
Ed Dames hasn't made an accurate prediction in years. Remember when he said on Art Bell that he was going to remote view a treasure of gold and bring it to Art Bell's ranch? People speculate that he was talking about the Lost_Dutchman's_Gold_Mine ... Anyway, yeah, so, it never happened...
And then there was the destruction of Shea Stadium, confidently predicted by Dames for july of (?)2002. Just like that other clown Richard Hoagland, Dames gets airtime because Art Bell and George Noory are both too clueless to understand when they're being conned. At least Dames doesn't mis-use the public media by begging for cash... El Ingles 14:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion Nomination
This page should be deleted. Someone nominate it for deletion. Behemoth418 17:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Tried, failed attempt. People were more concerned with my "credibility" then Ed Dames' notability.--Oublier 02:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Ed Dames at one point on Coast to Coast AM told the audience that Chandra Levy would be found in the Potomac river, she was of course found in the park. He also claimed the suspected congressman Gary Condit was not responsible that Ms. Levy was sexually involved with another man who was responsible. Would appreciate somebody looking up aditional sources since it seems there are enough things on this page showing his "accuracy".
[edit] bad-faith alert
Why is this article now being nominated for deletion AGAIN only two days after passing its second AfD? Even more interesting, the nominator, "OccultPortalBot", is a brand-new user and this is the username's very first act on Wikipedia. wikipediatrix 01:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Not my problem. But, that's wonderful. This article needs to be deleted. --Oublier 23:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Who the feck is Ed Dames?!?!?!? I don't think that hes noteable enough to get a WHOLE wikipedia article devoted to him. Maybe his article should be deleted and the info incorporated into the psi article. If no one objects in a few days I'll blank this article and move the research to the psi article. Smith Jones 23:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete!!
- El Ingles 13:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD history
As best as I can reconstruct it, there was an AfD in April of 2005 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Dames) that resulted in Delete, but apparently it was not deleted. In May of 2006, a there was a second AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Dames second nomination) that was ruled Speedy Keep as a bad faith nomination. A few days later, someone tried a third time, but messed up and linked to the first (closed) AfD instead of creating a new one. If anyone goes after this a fourth time, then they should label it "third nomination", and clearly reference the original vote to delete, which was not made clear in the second AfD. --141.156.215.20 20:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:BLP
As per Jimbo's dictum that all unsourced material about living persons be removed, this article should be reduced to a stub. There isn't a single paragraph in here that doesn't contain unsourced unflattering information, not even the introductory sentence. A total attack piece from start to finish. I'm gutting it. wikipediatrix 19:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
