User talk:Earwig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Your image addition to the Teabagging article is pointless. I am sure if someone wishes to see a scrotum they can look it up on a relevant article. This addition was obviously indented to cause trouble. Please do not do it again.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 16:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your attempts to improve Wikipedia. However, I would like to remind you that Wikipedia is not censored for minors, not even for profanity or pornography. Everyone is encouraged to remove offensive material and obscenities that are blatantly vandalism, but please do not remove/censor profanities or remove/disclaim sexually explicit material or links that are relevant to the article. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! Earwig 01:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Earwig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Mangojuice^talk 11:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Deprod of Cheap cd

Hi, I deprodded Cheap cd, which you proposed for deletion, because there was an AfD debate currently going on about that article (as you were aware of), and prod is only for uncontroversial deletions, and cannot override AfD. Also, just a reminder, when you tag an article with {{prod}} please use an edit summary; sometimes prod's get removed, but they shouldn't get re-prod'ed, and being able to scan through the edit history will help people figure out whether an article has been prod'ed before. Thanks! Mangojuice^talk 11:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I will use edit summaries from now on, thanks for the tip! Earwig 20:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Troll

Your account has been indefinitely blocked for trolling, including the GNAA and Goatse references on your user page. — Phil Welch (t) (c) 00:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! I see that justice is summarily dispensed at the whim of the administrative elite, on Wikipedia! Who knows how many people you have saved from the horrors of my userpage! HUZZAH FOR PHILWELCH THE HERO Earwig 02:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, thanks for confirming my conclusions. I think this matter is closed. — Phil Welch (t) (c) 05:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, but that's where you're wrong! It's wide open! Earwig 05:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps the more apt and iron-fisted approach of a full edit-block might be warranted, no?--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 05:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

All he can do is ramble on here, where no one cares. I can protect this page to stop that though, which I think I'll go ahead and do. — Phil Welch (t) (c) 06:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)