Talk:Early Vasa era
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Early Vasa era is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
I suggest to move this article to Foundation of modern Sweden. Fred-Chess 10:10, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Readability
Just for fun, I did a test on the section "Reformation" http://www.ilovejackdaniels.com/readability.php to check its readability. Here is the scores:
Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease: 30
Ideally, web page text should be around the 60 to 80 mark on this scale. The higher the score, the more readable the text.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 16
Ideally, web page text should be around the 6 to 7 mark on this scale. The lower the score, the more readable the text.
Gunning-Fog Index: 24
Ideally, web page text should be between 11 and 15 on this scale. The lower the score, the more readable the text. (Anything over 22 should be considered the equivalent of post-graduate level text).
Fred-Chess 23:49, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Hmmm I get this result for all texts I try. Maybe it doesn't compute. / Fred-Chess 23:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Gustav Vasas way to power
Theres a miss in the History of Sweden series. Gustav Vasas way to power isnt described in any of the articles. It should be somewhere in between Early Swedish history and Early Vasa era. The question is, in wich article should we put it? It is needed in the first to understand the final breakdown of the Kalmar Union, but its needed in the second as well to give a background to Gustavs rule. Propably there should be a more lenghty description in one of the articles, and a summary in the other. But where should we put the biggest part of the information?
--Screensaver 22:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
