User talk:Eakers4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just in case you get confused with what I've done, I've listed the deletion discussion about Robert Stanek seperately from that on his books; I feel the arguments for deleting the pages on his books don't really apply to a page about the author.

I'm not sure if those who've already voted would want to delete it - I guess they would, but I can't be sure, so I removed the votes you'd copied across from the Ruin Mist discussion.

The deletion discussion is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Stanek for the page on the author, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruin Mist for the ones on the fiction. Both are now listed seperately on the Articles for deletion page. Shimgray | talk | 01:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

I've now left a note for everyone who already left a comment at the Ruin Mist discussion pointing out the second debate. Shimgray | talk | 01:45, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletions on Robert Stanek

Hello, you seem to be blanking the Robert Stanek article.

Note that many people would consider blanking stuff you don't happen to like vandalism and at least very naughty. Also, blanking the page while it is in Articles for Deletion is not appropriate solely because the article is being deleted; AfD is a debate on whether or not the article should be deleted and no article is deleted without clear consensus, so the articles should be treated as normal during this period.

If you have objections about the article's content, please tag the article or section with {{accuracy}} and voice your objections on Talk:Robert Stanek, preferrably in form of information that might be more accurate.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 01:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)