User talk:Drrngrvy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

goto:
Sandbox

Hello, Drrngrvy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions...

[edit] Hello

lol made me smile ··gracefool |☺ 01:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk main page

Viewing deleted content is limited to admins because some things that get removed could contain text that could cause the Foundation legal problems, or include personal information that was deleted for privacy reasons. Admins are generally considered to be responsible enough to deal with that sort of information in an appropriate manner. Non-admins used to be able to view the history page for deleted articles, so that they could see who had edited it and the edit summaries. Unfortunately, we started getting cases where personal information was being posted to edit summaries, so that functionality was turned off. If you are interested in the contents of Jamal Kelly, I can dump the article to your sandbox as none of the above problems existed with this article. --GraemeL ^(talk) 15:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

That makes perfect sense. Cheers. But since I'm feeling curious, would you mind dumping that page on me? - Drrngrvy 15:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

No problem. It's in User:Drrngrvy/Sandbox. --GraemeL ^(talk) 16:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Much appreciated - Drrngrvy 16:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My "go"

Yeah, sorry about that... I saw a hmmmm on a user page and didn't think twice. --Chodorkovskiy ^(talk) 06:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Feck, from List of fictional expletives

Hi! I removed 'feck' from the list of fictional expletives as it is not fictional. You'll notice extensive discussion of the topic on the talk page of that article, including the info that it is a common word, used as an expletive, in Ireland. Thanks for the contribution and happy editing!--Anchoress 22:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dup link

Re: this edit for Unix time.
The duplicate links are Time (computing) and System time. The second one redirects to the first one, but I kept the second spelling because it sounds more relevant (obviously either one is correct). — Loadmaster 19:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ISBN rewriter

Thanks for the tip. Lunchboxhero