Talk:Dromornithidae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dromornithidae article.

Peer review Dromornithidae has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Dromornithidae is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.

Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

Flag Dromornithidae is part of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


[edit] Mihirungs?

  • "Mihirung" seems to be a pretty common name for these birds, and the current article Mihirung is just a short stub. Maybe this page should be moved to Mihirung, given the guideline to use common names as titles rahter than scientific names where possible. Either that or Demon Ducks of Doom...Dinoguy2 06:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Hmm, I don't know. Google shows over 650 hits for "Dromornithidae", but just over 150 for Mihirung. The Mihirung article is uselss as it is and should probably be made a redirect to Dromornithidae... I'll do that if you don't object. Mstroeck 13:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
      • Sounds good to me.Dinoguy2 16:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
        • Done.Mstroeck 01:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] .

i like the article, but some of the sentences are choppy (short), kinda like 3rd grade stuff. i would prefer it if someone made the sentences look as if it was written by a professional. but still, even without them, the article is pretty sweet!

[edit] Failed GA

A reference dump at the end of the article just doesn't do it for me. Needs in-line citations. I like the organization, though. savidan(talk) (e@) 04:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)