User talk:Drewdy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 21:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. Check out your user page!
[edit] Userpage Images
Sorry but I've removed all your images on your userpage as they are copyright. See WP:FU for more information. Feel free to add images that are in Public Domain to your user page.--Andeh 09:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bigweld (Robots)
Let's work together to make your newly written article a better, more informative article!
RelentlessRouge 19:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Great job, Drewdy!
- RelentlessRouge 19:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Alright... I looked at your userpage. Anything else you want to work with me on? Also, I see that you've put a userbox on your page. Very nice. Did you get it from me? =)
-
- RelentlessRouge 20:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- On talk pages, put 4 tildes (~~~~) to sign it. It's VERY helpful.
-
-
-
- RelentlessRouge 20:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Collaborating on Robots?
If you want to work together, let's do it!
RelentlessRouge 20:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Drewdy, what's the name of the page?
- RelentlessRouge 20:11, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Hi, Drewdy. I'm NOT BY ANY MEANS an expert on Robots. Start the page sbd let's go...
-
- RelentlessRouge 20:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Hello, Drewdy! After this message I will be taking a wikibreak. I have edited for several hours, so,... right. Ok. As I said before: "I'm NOT BY ANY MEANS an expert on Robots." I will try to contribute, but you are definately far more knowledgable about that topic than I. I will try to Wikify it, though.
-
-
-
- RelentlessRouge 20:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- And by the way, next time, on talk pages, try to leave a line between every comment. You also can use # in front of every comment to denote the number. If that was used, then it'd look like: 1. Comment ABC (line) 2. Comment DEF (line), etc... Or else, you can use colons to indent. To see what I mean, look at the coding for all my comments to you.
-
-
-
-
-
- See ya later, RelentlessRouge
-
-
[edit] Robots (film) collaboration
Here we go... I Wikified Fender (robots).
RelentlessRouge 02:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hello, Drewdy. I would not recommend use of the words fictional robot character on your Robots articles. Many people, including administrators, would interpret this as a character that you invented that has to do with the movie. I would recommend the following:
- Fender is a [[fictional character|robot character]] that
- I'll be Wikifying other Robots articles.
- Sincerely, RelentlessRouge 11:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Cheers, Drewdy! I've been looking over the article "Robots (film)". It appears to me that the "plot" section was directly taken off of the back cover of the D.V.D. I would like to mention that summary would be more appropriately filed under a "summary" section. More background is also needed for the movie. In addition, there are many red links. It would be best if you could either remove them or create articles for them. Also, I would also like to add that the "DVD release" section is only one line, which fails to justify its existance. I will move the sentence up to the introductory paragraph. Finally, I will add a {{seealso|Robots (soundtrack)}} tag up on the top and delete the one-line "soundtrack" section. Let's work together!
-
- RelentlessRouge 11:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please don't do this ever again
I am planning to report you for a severe editing revert on the List of Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends Characters page. I set it back by reverting to the previous edit. Please do not do it again. NoseNuggets 12:59 PM US EDT July 6 2006
[edit] All Star (Spoof Version)
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article All Star (Spoof Version), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:All Star (Spoof Version). If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Irongargoyle 22:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sonic Riders 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball
Please read this. Information you have added and re-added to Sonic Riders 2 is against Wikipedia guidelines and do not belong in the article. BlazeHedgehog 16:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Speaking of which, I have promoted the article as a Speedy Deletion candidate, the reason being that this article was created before, based solely on the interview in Eurogamer, and that simply isn't enough information to base a full article on; as such, the article was debated, and it was decided to DELETE it. Because you have recreated the article with no new verifiable information, this article has insufficient backing, and should be deleted. For reference, here is the page on Wikipedia's Speedy Deletion Criteria. -- VederJuda 17:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spinach with Chocolate Sauce
Thank you for your work on Spinach with Chocolate Sauce. Unfortunately, not all articles are suitable for Wikipedia. If you want to add articles on books, you might want to look at WP:Notability for some guidelines on what is and is not encyclopedic. --Bookgrrl 01:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Nomination: Spinach with Chocolate Sauce
I've nominated the article Spinach with Chocolate Sauce for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Spinach with Chocolate Sauce satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinach with Chocolate Sauce. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Spinach with Chocolate Sauce during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. ... discospinster talk 13:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] dont move a page without consent of talk forum
you have recently moved Wii to NintendoWii this isnt cool
[edit] Goo Goo Gaga/Goo Goo Ga Ga?
Why did you randomly move that page over to Goo Goo Ga Ga? You didn't even provide why you even moved it in the first place in the reason box. Squirepants101 23:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please Use Edit Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Squirepants101 02:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)