User talk:Dr. Zaret
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
Kukini 02:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I noticed you were hard at work with no feedback nor greeting from the community. Keep up the good work! Kukini 02:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hah! I had no idea you had a secret identity. It explains why you "look" new but are doing such great work. Dunno if I know you from elsewhere. I do appreciate RC patrollers. I also try to be welcoming and explaining when I do it in order to build a strong wikicommunity. Kukini 04:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
Bhadani has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
--Bhadani 14:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] email
Where can I find rules regarding displaying email on Wikipedia? - Dr. Zaret 23:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand the question, can you be more specific. In what circumstance are you displaying some email on wikipedia? --pgk(talk) 23:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- You bet. I've noticed that on some talk pages, emails have been removed and replaced with <email removed> (or something similar). I was wondering why this is, and what the policy is regarding it? - Dr. Zaret 00:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Can't say I've come across that so without specific examples I couldn't tell you what particular policy it related to. It could be removed for a number of reasons, general prvicy being one. It might be just the email address which was removed, posting peoples personal information such as that is a blockable issue (WP:BLOCK#Posting_personal_details). --pgk(talk) 00:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- You bet. I've noticed that on some talk pages, emails have been removed and replaced with <email removed> (or something similar). I was wondering why this is, and what the policy is regarding it? - Dr. Zaret 00:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Argh!
Your reversion of vandalism on Anglicanism blanked whole sections of legitimate later text, including my new section on ecumenism, which had involved a lot of hard work! I don't know how to reinsert the later stuff that were put in after your revert, so I'm just going with my version. Fishhead64 01:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Many thanks! My apologies for my rather harried tone - you know us prickly Wikipedians. Cheers Fishhead64 04:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
hey, I flippin' live in Albany, who's better qualified to edit an article about it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.1.39.15 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Thanks!
Hey man, just thought I should thank you for reverting my user page after it was vandalized. Keep up the good work! El Oso 05:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Not a prob, Bob. - The Good Doctor 05:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion
Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 21:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Category:Australian lawyers - is there any chance that page I created that you reverted could be moved to Gad-Ben Meir's page?
- Yes, I can do that. Where is this page? - The Good Doctor 04:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
