Talk:Dominika Slomczynska
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Number of images
As per my edit comments, there was really no need for three images in an article of this size. I'm not entirely convinced that two are necessary - I'll give it some thought - but three was certainly excessive. If you have a valid argument why all three were needed, please explain here! CLW 23:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Further to the above, I note that only one of the images has licencing details, so this is the only one which can be legitimately used to illustrate the article. CLW 23:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
The two images were supplied by Slomczynska herself to the press in 2005 and I have uploaded them again with licencing specified as copyright free for any use. Hopefully this will be OK. As to the number of images, that of course is subjective, but the third was added to fill in a void. If it is policy to keep things to a minimum, then fine, but I thought it better balance with the three and apparently she like it that way herself. Sorry for any problems I may have caused here.
- How do you know she likes the page better with three images?Tommstein 12:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Please remember that this is an encyclopedia article, not a fan site. "...she like it that way herself" (?) is not a valid reason for having three pictures on a stub article. If you looked someone up in an encyclopedia, would you really expect to find this many illustrations for an article of this size? One illustration is enough to illustrate what the subject of the article looks like. Three illustrations is excessive. CLW 14:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)