User talk:DMeyering
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] A welcome from Sango123
Hello, DMeyering, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
–Sango123 (e) 18:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
[edit] Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue II
The April 2006 issue of the project newsletter is now out. You may read this issue or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following the link. Thanks. Kirill Lokshin 18:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: War of the League of Cambrai
Thank you very much for the kind words! Yes, I did write most of the text myself; there were a few stubs that I merged it at various points, but very little of their original wording has survived. I guess the time I spent writing essays in the IB program was actually useful for something ;-) Kirill Lokshin 02:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue III - May 2006
The May 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —ERcheck @ 23:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006
The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 06:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006
The July 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot.
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Coordinator Elections!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 11!
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 18:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006
The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ==Regarding edits to Paris Hilton==
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
......yeah, yeah, yeah....sorry, I would normally never vandalise a page like that but I couldn't resist. It's just that I have a total lack of respect for Paris Hilton and feel that her article should be nothing more than a tiny stub. I mean what has she done to be notable besides be rich? she has been a slut, as is evident from that porno she made. Antimatter 00:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] MedCabal
Hi, we have a heavy backload of cases at WP:MEDCAB and since you are on the mediator list I thought I would request your help. Thanks! --Ideogram 10:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Medcabal-thumb wrestling
I would like to work with you on that case (looks fun as you said). Note that you and I are also working on [1]; :) WikieZach| talk 22:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for stepping in on this one. I'm curious, though. Would you rather the conversation take place on your talk page or on the request for mediation talk page for this matter? That particular talk page already has a pretty representative dialogue on it.[2] Rklawton 01:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, the thumb one seems shut. The other one may take a while. Your intro seems ok. WikieZach| talk 01:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
The ITWA hasn't purchased a web domain as of yet, hence the lame geocities site. Additionally, here are two more articles referencing the ITWA and members of said organization: [Article #1] [Article #2] Slyder PilotE@ 12:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Both these "articles" are actually commentaries - and they are written by a single commentator. Mention by a single commentator is far far from notable or worthy of mention. Rklawton 15:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- They are in fact articles and despite being from the same writer, they are worth mentioning. Slyder PilotE@ 17:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signature test
I'm trying my new signature Antimatter*talk* 00:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC) and again Antimatter*talk* 00:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
and again Antimatter---talk--- 00:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Coffee table book
Thank you for taking this project on for mediation. I will only add that Coffee table book is the example on the wikipedia: grading scheme template in an earlier version (as an example of a typical "stub" class. As a result, the current version of the article probably gets more hits than most articles do. (I was the one who put a prior version of coffee table book as the scheme's example many months ago, because I think it shows how irrelevant text does not make a "stub" into a "start" article.) Anyway, not relevant to the mediation, per se, but it's why I care about the article. Again, thanks. Thesmothete 04:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
No, that's not necessary. All but one of the examples on the grading scheme list link back to prior versions -- that's the point: to show different stages in an article's progression. But, once having linked to the prior version, I suspect some people are curious about "what became of this article" and then click on the current version. So, even if it's not FA status, it should at least be better, and not worse than the early version that's used as the example. Anyway, the main focus should be on resolving this revert war. Thesmothete 13:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thumb medcabal case
Use a straw poll to see where everyone stands. WikieZach| talk 16:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
