Talk:Differentiation under the integral sign
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Consider the function defined by f(x,t) = 0 if t = 0 and by
if . This is integrable with respect to t for so the function
is at least defined. But isn't integrable, so one of the integrals appearing in the result is undefined. And in fact F is not differentiable.
So at the least we must add the hypothesis that F be differentiable. But I doubt if this will be enough to make the result true. If we allow t to vary over an infinite inteval then there is the following counter example. Let
- f(x,t) = x3exp( − x2t)
for all x and for . Then
- ,
so F is differentiable, with F'(0) = 1. But
so the derivative of F at 0 is not given by differentiating under the integral sign.
88.105.188.214 05:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)