User talk:Dev920/Absolutely and completely, totally and utterly devestating
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The purpose of the extra bolded words is to emphasize the likelihood of one changing one's opinions, not as a comment to change the importance or validity of the vote. Personally, I find them useful, as I like to try and undertand strong opinions on both sides. By the way, your insertion of this ridiculouly long mockery of what you are against is a textbook case of disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. I might suggest that you reconsider that action, as it's somewhat distracting and irritating. Snoutwood (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Simply adding a strong in front of your vote does not mean you have a stonger opinion than, say, me. I have voted on AfDs I have never felt so strongly about the income in my life, but I have never used an extra adjective, because, as you put it, it's somewhat distracting and irritating. Might I suggest you reconsider your actions? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 06:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Erm, yes, in fact you have used quite a few adjectives in at least one vote. Four, in fact, in a jab at other people who use adjectives in votes (which seems strange). Specifically, the adjectives were absolutely, completely, totally, and utterly. Here's an example in case you're not sure what I'm referring to. I'm not at all sure which actions of mine you happen to be mentioning, but I guarantee you that it was obnoxious to see your monstrosity of a vote used for the hypocritical reason that you don't want to see monstrous votes. Hence the WP:POINT mention. Snoutwood (talk) 06:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Mate, you have no sense of humour or irony. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, no, but I did edit war over Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman. :) Snoutwood (talk) 08:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Mate, you have no sense of humour or irony. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Erm, yes, in fact you have used quite a few adjectives in at least one vote. Four, in fact, in a jab at other people who use adjectives in votes (which seems strange). Specifically, the adjectives were absolutely, completely, totally, and utterly. Here's an example in case you're not sure what I'm referring to. I'm not at all sure which actions of mine you happen to be mentioning, but I guarantee you that it was obnoxious to see your monstrosity of a vote used for the hypocritical reason that you don't want to see monstrous votes. Hence the WP:POINT mention. Snoutwood (talk) 06:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
