Talk:Designated hitter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
the designated hitter should be abolished. i think every man should have to do their own part while on the field; both defensivly and offensively.
- Perhaps, but this page is for discussing the merits of and possible changes to the article, not opinions on the subject matter. --Locarno 14:30, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
When reading this page, I felt the POV was way too heavily towards the pro-DH position. This is probably because I think the DH is the worst idea in the history of the game. In any case, I have re-edited the article to include more on why NL fans prefer the more traditional, pre-1973 style of play. Vidor 23:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Injecting anti-DH POV is not a valid counter to the alleged pro-DH POV. You can rewrite sections to be more neutral, but it is not a valid use of Wikipedia to rewrite the article into an abolish-the-designated-hitter website. Also, I removed the "akin to football" line because it's simply not a valid comparison. In football, there are completely different teams for offense and defense, whereas the Designated Hitter rule makes the role of only ONE player purely defensive; as I wrote, this is more like a goalie in hockey or soccer. Iceberg3k 10:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well, I did no such thing as "rewrite the article into an abolish-the-designated-hitter" website. And the "akin to football" line is ENTIRELY valid, because the DH is indeed an offensive specialist, and his presence makes the pitcher into a defensive specialist, which is like football. The fact that the American League has a specialist at one position and football is entirely specialized in no way makes the analogy invalid. Your comparison to a goalie, on the other hand, is invalid, as the goalie in hockey or soccer is on the field for the entire time, unlike a DH (or an American League pitcher), who plays only half the game, just like football. Nor is the "pro-DH POV" "alleged"; the article as I found it had about half a paragraph of arguments against the DH and much, much more material on why it's a super idea.
-
- I would further argue that having a section dedicated to "controversy" necessitates having different POV, and that if we are to have such a section, that it must be balanced between pro and con instead of being strongly pro-DH. I would rather the "controversy" section be deleted entirely, and the article be limited to the DH rule and its history, than have a pro-DH article, as it is in its current form. Vidor 06:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Molitor
Removed:
- Only one designated hitter has been elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame, when Molitor was elected in 2004.
This doesn't make sense. Like almost all DH's, Molitor came up as a position player, played 3rd base for a number of years before injuries moved him over to the DH spot. A number of other HoF players finished their careers as DH's, including the aforementioned Aaron and Yastrzemski. Ellsworth 21:45, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. This could only be said if Molitor was a DH for (1) most of his years and (2) his best years. Niether is true. However, Edgar Martinez may be the first to earn this dubious distinction. --Locarno 22:00, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] HoF DH's
The article should include a list of HoF players who finished their careers as DHs - this innovative position did extend a few careers by a year or two, allowing Aaron to finish his career in Milwaukee (where once played for the NL Braves), playing his final season for the (then) AL Brewers. (See also Reggie Jackson in Oakland) Yadin twelve 05:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC) Yadin twelve 04:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC) (sorry, my posting yesterday was cutoff)
Molitor played more games as a DH than at any other postion.
[edit] When does an AL team lose their DH?
Could some kindly editor please detail the conditions under which an AL team loses their DH? I'm thoroughly confused on this issue, and came to this page looking for an explanation (as I'm sure did plenty of others who watched tonight's Angels/Yankees game!) I know it's some sort of player substitution, but what is the rule exactly, and for what reasons is this most likely to take place, since it's so rare? — Adam Conover † 04:02, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Pretty simple concept: If the player in the DH role changes to a fielding position, the team forfeits the DH for the rest of the game and the pitcher must bat in the newly-opened spot. Yesterday, Crosby came out of the game, Bernie Williams switched from DH to CF, and the pitcher would then bat in Crosby's spot in the order. As it played out, old man Sierra came in to pinch-hit for the pitcher, so the move didn't really affect anything. Anyway, this was explained in the first paragraph, but I've changed it into the second paragraph to make it clear. --Locarno 15:32, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Article construction
I am working on improving this article, taking into consideration the concerns expressed here (though not the opinions). Em-jay-es 06:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ortiz
Is the section about whether Ortiz should be the MVP still necessary? I know it was a big deal last fall, but since he didn't end up getting the award, maybe this section deserves to be shortened to one or two sentences and/or moved to the separate article about "list of notable DH's" Dakern74 02:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minors
While I was venting about Ortiz just above, an anonymous editor has removed an entire paragraph I had written earlier today explaining how the DH rule is applied in the minor leagues. Is this not relevant to the article? Or if something I had in there was factually inaccurate, I'd appreciate a response. Dakern74 03:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hit By Pitch?
"However, sabermetrics have not borne this out; inside pitching and intentional hit batsmen have actually decreased in both leagues since 1973."
Well I just checked and HBP has RISEN by about 100% from the late 60's/early 70's. I'm not sure what an "intentional" HBP is, but unless a piece of research is referenced here I'm going to delete this. John DiFool2 16 June 2006
--->Just wondering, where did you "check" this? Do you have a link? Also, is this for just the AL? Or all of MLB?
Any decent reference source, such as www.baseball-reference.com, will indicate the rise in HBP over the past 30 years or so. John DiFool2 16 July 2006
