Democratic Party primary, Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about Connecticut's 2006 U.S. Senate Democratic Party primary. For Connecticut's 2006 U.S. Senate general election, see Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006.
This article or section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please help improve this article or replace this tag with a more specific message. This article has been tagged since August 2006. (help, talk)
Ned Lamont (left) debated Joe Lieberman, pictured here during a July 6 NBC 30 debate, in the August 8 Democratic primary
Enlarge
Ned Lamont (left) debated Joe Lieberman, pictured here during a July 6 NBC 30 debate, in the August 8 Democratic primary

The 2006 Connecticut Senate Democratic Primary was held on August 8, 2006 and pitted three-term incumbent Senator Joe Lieberman against cable executive Ned Lamont. Connecticut is a stronghold for the Democratic Party and Senator Lieberman's seat was not considered competitive and unlikely to switch parties.[1] However, Senator Lieberman had created opposition to his re-election among progressive Democrats due to his stance on many progressive issues, his continued support for the Iraq War, and perceived closeness to the George W. Bush administration.

Contents

[edit] Democratic Primary Results

2006 Connecticut United States Senate Election Democratic Primary
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Ned Lamont 146,587 51.79% N/A
Democratic Joe Lieberman (Incumbent) 136,468 48.21% N/A

From the Hartford Courant

[edit] Opposition to Lieberman

Lieberman's critics object to what they call Lieberman's lack of commitment to the Democratic party;[2]his opposition to affirmative action;[3] his opposition to a Connecticut state law that would require Catholic hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims;[4] his opposition to same-sex marriage;[5] his membership in the Gang of 14;[6] his support of Florida governor Jeb Bush in the Terri Schiavo case;[7] his willingness to compromise on Social Security privatization;[8] his alliances with Republicans[9] and attacks on other Democrats;[10][11][12] and Lieberman's rhetoric, which is believed by many Democrats, including Paul Krugman and former John Kerry advisor Ari Melber, to often support Republican talking points.[13][14][15] Paul Bass, in the Hartford Courant, argues that Lieberman's voting record is not representative of his actions.[16]

Lieberman has been criticized for an editorial he wrote for The Wall Street Journal, in which he suggested that criticism of the President and the war put the nation in jeopardy. He declared "we undermine presidential credibility at our nation's peril."[17]

[edit] Opposition to Lamont

New Republic senior editor and "liberal hawk" Jonathan Chait, who is critical of Lieberman on a variety of issues, writes:

   
“
 I can't quite root for Lieberman to lose his primary. What's holding me back is that the anti-Lieberman campaign has come to stand for much more than Lieberman's sins. It's a test of strength for the new breed of left-wing activists who are flexing their muscles within the party. These are exactly the sorts of fanatics who tore the party apart in the late 1960s and early 1970s. They think in simple slogans and refuse to tolerate any ideological dissent."[18]
   
”

Kevin Drum, in The Washington Monthly, objects to this characterization of Lieberman's opponents, writing:

   
“
 Chait calls the Kos/Atrios wing "left-wing activists." But this is a serious misreading.... They aren't especially left wing. Markos in particular specifically prides himself on caring mostly about winning elections, not fighting ideological battles. Now, there's no question that the left blogosphere is vaguely in favor of all the usual liberal goals: progressive taxation, decent healthcare for everyone, tolerance for minorities, and so forth. And, yes, they're loudly in favor of these things.... But to compare it to the left-wing radicals of the early 70s is to misunderstand it completely. Netroots favorite Howard Dean is no lefty radical, and at a policy level most of the high-traffic liberal blogs are only modestly to the left of the DLC."[19]
   
”

Many Democrats have argued that a primary race against Lieberman will divert energy and attention from other contested Senate races; Lieberman and Lamont are spending millions of dollars on a primary for what would be a safe Democratic seat. Because of Lieberman's high favorability ratings in Connecticut, some strategists consider the commitment of significant resources toward defeating Lieberman to be dubious.[citation needed] Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid's request to Lamont not to run was rebuffed.[citation needed]

Lamont's opinions regarding Israel's recent military campaign in Lebanon have been criticised. Hartford Courant columnist Kevin Rennie wrote on August 13:

   
“
 Lamont's is a frightening point of view that ignores decades of determination by Islamic terrorists to kill Jews. The means have become more lethal and sophisticated, but there is nothing new in the purpose. To blame George W. Bush for the missiles flying from southern Lebanon into northern Israeli towns betrays a malignant partisanship by Lamont that ought to alarm voters on most spots of the political spectrum"[20]
   
”

[edit] Primary Political ads

[edit] Lieberman

Lieberman campaign ads are the work of Carter Eskew, who previously functioned in that role in Lieberman's first campaign in 1988. [21]

"Bear cub" ad

Lieberman's Attack ad on Lamont; lampooning him as a bearcub
Enlarge
Lieberman's Attack ad on Lamont; lampooning him as a bearcub

On June 16, 2006, Lieberman released a web-based ad on his campaign site aimed at Lamont's support from Lowell Weicker. The animated ad is a sequel to a 1988 spot portraying Weicker as a sleeping bear - this time, Lamont is Weicker's "bear cub." The narrator of the ad asks, "Remember Lowell Weicker? Well, bears never forget. He's never gotten over losing his Senate race to Joe Lieberman, but instead of coming out of hibernation, he's sent his bear cub, instead. Ned Lamont." On its initial release, the ad received a negative response from many political bloggers, some characterizing it as amateurish.[22]

"No More Joe" ad Lieberman released an advertisement that aired on Fox News on July 9 and CSPAN during the first Lieberman-Lamont Debate. The ad argues that Lamont stands for little more than opposition to Lieberman. In service of this point, the Lieberman ad displays "an invented bumper sticker and fictitious website address, making them appear to be part of his primary challenger Ned Lamont's campaign."[23]

"Bill Clinton" ad Lieberman began airing an ad on Connecticut broadcast television stations featuring footage from his rally with former President Bill Clinton in Waterbury on July 26.[24]

"Unity" ad

On August 11, Lieberman began running an ad on Connecticut TV stations outlining his rationale for a third party run, stating he wanted to bring a "unity of purpose" back to Washington.[25]

[edit] Lamont

Lamont campaign ads are the work of Bill Hillsman, who has previously produced ads for Governor Jesse Ventura and Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota, Denver, Colorado Mayor John Hickenlooper, and Texas Independent gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman.[26]

"Right Now" ad In his first television commercial, Lamont is shown talking on a sofa in a well-appointed home while supporters peer through his window and eventually storm the house.

"Messy Desk" ad Lamont released a humorous ad mocking the frivolity of many of Lieberman's negative attack ads: "Meet Ned Lamont," begins a foreboding narrator, "He can't make a decent cup of coffee, he's a bad karaoke singer, and he has a messy desk."

Lamont later chimes in, "Aren't you sick of political attack ads that insult your intelligence? Senator Lieberman, let's stick to issues and pledge to support whoever wins the Democratic primary."

"Wishing Well" ad

"Where's Joe?" ad

"Who's Joe?" ad

"The Issue" ad

"Go for It, Mr. Lamont!" ad

[edit] Lieberman allegations of website attack

Joe2006.com on the day of the primary election.
Enlarge
Joe2006.com on the day of the primary election.

From midmorning August 7th to well past August 9th, Lieberman's official campaign site joe2006.com was taken offline; officials from Lieberman's campaign claimed "dirty politics" and "Rovian tactics" on the part of Lamont's supporters, and more specifically, a sustained Distributed Denial of Service attack that, according to the Lieberman campaign, has left the site down for several days.[27]

On Wednesday August 9th, 2006, the Lieberman website was updated with the following message among a white screen:[28]

   
“
 UPDATE ON THE ATTACK ON THE LIEBERMAN CAMPAIGN WEBSITE

STATEMENT FROM SEAN SMITH: "For the past 24 hours the Friends for Joe Lieberman's website and email has been totally disrupted and disabled, we believe that this is the result of a coordinated attack by our political opponents. The campaign has notified the US Attorney and the Connecticut Chief State's Attorney and the campaign will be filing a formal complaint reflecting our concerns. The campaign has also notified the State Attorney General Dick Blumenthal for his review."

"We call on Ned Lamont to make an unqualified statement denouncing this kind of dirty campaign trick and to demand whoever is responsible to cease and desist immediately. Any attempt to suppress voter participation and undermine the voting process on Election Day is deplorable and has no place in our democracy."
   
”

Tim Tagaris, Lamont's Internet communications director, denied the charge and attributed the downtime to the fact that the Lieberman campaign had chosen an inferior web host, or ISP, and was only paying $15/month to operate its site (in comparison to the $1500/month being spent by the Lamont campaign).[29][30][31] He then offered to help bring their servers back up, along with providing a link to a cached version of Lieberman's site on their blog.[32]

Markos Zuniga, of Daily Kos also posted that he was able to telnet into the IP address where the Lieberman campaign's website existed, which would be impossible if a DDoS attack had occurred.[33]

On August 8th, Lieberman contacted the Connecticut attorney general's office and asked for a criminal investigation by state and federal authorities. Connecticuts Attorney General Richard Blumenthal stated in a official press release that he plans to investigate the website hacking.[34]

   
“
 I have received a complaint from Sen. Lieberman's campaign asking my office to investigate the hacking of his campaign web site. I will investigate potential violations of anti-hacking provisions of our state computer crimes laws that are specifically within my jurisdiction. I will also work with the State Elections Enforcement Commission, and state and federal criminal authorities concerning possible violations of state election statutes, and federal election protections and other laws. We will seek civil and criminal penalties, where appropriate.
   
”

Richard M. Smith, an Internet security consultant in Brookline, Mass., said Lieberman's website was the victim of a denial of service attack, though he said that the Lieberman campaign "went a little cheap" by using a "low-budget hosting service." [35][36]

[edit] Other related website outages on Primary Day

DailyKos.com, MyDD.com, and FireDogLake.com, all liberal websites that covered the Connecticut primary extensively, all went down on Primary Day due to traffic spikes related to the primary. DailyKos estimated that at one point in the day, they were receiving 2,000 hits per minute. [37][38]

[edit] Opinion Polls

Source Date Lieberman Lamont
Actual Primary Results August 8, 2006 48.21% 51.79%
Quinnipiac (likely primary voters) August 7, 2006 45% 51%
Research 2000 (likely primary voters) August 4, 2006 43% 53%
Quinnipiac (likely primary voters) August 3, 2006 41% 54%
Rasmussen (likely primary voters) July 20, 2006 41% 51%
Quinnipiac (likely primary voters) July 20, 2006 47% 51%
"Democratic internal poll" (JTA) (Jewish voters) July 5, 2006 41% 50%
Rasmussen (likely primary voters) June 14, 2006 46% 40%
Quinnipiac (likely primary voters) June 8, 2006 55% 40%
Quinnipiac (all Democrats) June 8, 2006 57% 32%
Quinnipiac (all Democrats) May 2, 2006 65% 19%
Rasmussen April 27, 2006 51% 31%

[edit] Endorsements

[edit] For Lieberman

Individuals

Organizations

  • AFL-CIO and affiliated labor organizations endorsed Lieberman.[47][48] However, Connecticut AFT, the second largest AFL-CIO union in Connecticut, endorsed Lamont (see below).
  • NARAL Pro-choice America PAC, which lobbies for reproductive rights nationally, has endorsed Lieberman.[50] However, Carolyn Treiss, head of Connecticut NARAL, supports Lamont.[51]
  • Human Rights Campaign, one of the largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) equal rights organizations in the United States, has endorsed Lieberman.[52]

Newspapers

  • The Greenwich Time.[57]
  • The Washington Post published an editorial offering some praise of Lieberman,[58] but did not use the word endorse or otherwise explicitly call for his reelection.

[edit] For Lamont

Individuals

  • Former U.S. Senator and Governor Lowell Weicker, who was unseated by Lieberman in 1988 and had been considering running as an independent, gave Lamont his endorsement.[62] Weicker served in the Senate as a Republican from 1971-1989, and as Governor as an independent from 1991 to 1995.
  • George Jepsen, former Connecticut Senate Majority Leader and former Chair of the Connecticut Democratic Party.
  • Carl Feen, Lieberman's first finance chair, and Irv Stolberg, former Speaker of the Connecticut House of Representatives.
  • Christopher Donovan, Majority Leader, Connecticut House of Representatives.[64]
  • Denise Merrill, Co-Chair, Connecticut General Assembly Appropriations Committee.[66]
  • Lieberman's former college roommate David Wyles.[67]

Organizations

  • MoveOn.org endorsed Lamont's Senate campaign in an "Online Primary",[69] with Lamont winning 85% of the vote and Lieberman winning only 14%.
  • Democracy for America, a political action committee founded by Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean and run by his brother Jim Dean, endorsed and began collecting donations for Ned Lamont. Howard Dean ran against Joe Lieberman in the heated 2004 Democratic presidential primary race, and Lieberman criticized Dean for sealing some of his official papers when he left his office as the governor of Vermont.[citation needed] Jim Dean is a Connecticut resident.
  • Democratic National Committee - The DNC remained neutral until after Lamont won the the democratic primary. After his win, Howard Dean, the Chairman of the DNC, called for Lieberman to exit the race and said the DNC would support Lamont.[72]

Newspapers

  • The New York Times.[73]
  • The Hartford Advocate published an editorial by Alistair Highet, the newspaper's editor, critical of Lieberman and of the Courant's endorsement.[74]

[edit] Neutral

There are many Democratic Party officials and organizations that remained on the sidelines during the primary contest, stating only that they will support the Democratic nominee. Some of the most notable examples include:

  • Al Gore declined to endorse Lieberman, his 2000 vice presidential selection.[75]
  • Connecticut gubernatorial candidate John DeStefano endorsed Lieberman but campaigned with Lamont.[76]

[edit] Timeline

Early in the race, Lieberman led by 46 points according to a May 2 Quinnipiac Poll, but by August 3, the Quinnipiac Poll showed Lamont leading by 13 points over Lieberman in the primary. That poll indicated a commanding lead for Lieberman in a hypothetical three-way race between Lieberman, Lamont, and Schlesinger.[77]

Some Democrats, believing that a contested Democratic primary would drain resources from other races and that Lieberman would help other Democratic candidates on the ballot in November, discouraged the Lamont candidacy prior to the Democratic state convention and backed Lieberman. Former Democratic State Chairman John Droney compared the Lamont challenge to "cannibalism" [78] and Senator Harry Reid asked Lamont not to run.[79]

On May 19, Lieberman received 67 percent of the vote at the state Democratic convention, and Lamont received 33% of the vote, thereby qualifying for an August 8 Democratic primary.

On May 20, Connecticut Republicans nominated former Derby, Connecticut, Mayor Alan Schlesinger to run in the November election.

On June 12, Lamont began airing radio ads promising to endorse Lieberman if he lost the Democratic primary, and challenging Lieberman to do likewise and foreclose an independent run for the Senate.[citation needed]

On June 16, Lieberman released a web-based ad on his campaign site aimed at Lamont's support from Lowell Weicker. Produced by political consultant, Carter Eskew, the animated ad was a sequel to a 1988 spot portraying Weicker as a sleeping bear - this time, Lamont is Weicker's "bear cub." The narrator of the ad asked, "Remember Lowell Weicker? Well, bears never forget. He's never gotten over losing his Senate race to Joe Lieberman, but instead of coming out of hibernation, he's sent his bear cub, instead. Ned Lamont."

On July 3, Lieberman announced that he would file papers to appear on the November ballot should he lose the August 8 primary stating:

   
“
 I'm a loyal Democrat, but I have loyalties that are greater than those to my party, and that's my loyalty to my state and my country.
   
”

He stated that he would continue to sit as a Democrat in the Senate even if he was defeated in the primary and elected on an unaffiliated line, and expressed concern for a potentially low-turnout August 8 primary.[80]

On July 6, a debate between Lieberman and Lamont took place. MSNBC characterized Lieberman as "combative," "super-aggressive and sometimes rude"[81] "often interrupting Lamont" to which Lamont retorted, "This isn’t Fox News, sir." In the debate, Lamont refused to explain why he would not release his federal and state income tax returns, as Lieberman has done. [82][83] On July 9, Lieberman released an ad which, according to an e-mail to constituents, parodies one of Lamont's ads and features a fake bumper sticker claiming that "all Lamont has to say is 'No More Joe.'"FactCheck

On July 10, the Lieberman campaign officially filed paperwork allowing him to collect signatures for the newly formed Connecticut for Lieberman party ballot line.[84]

On July 24, former President Bill Clinton campaigned with Lieberman in Waterbury:

   
“
 [We Democrats] don't agree on everything. We don't agree on Iraq...the real issue is, whether you were for it or against it, what are we going to do now? And let me tell you something, no Democrat is responsible for the mistakes that have been made since the fall of Saddam Hussein that have brought us to this point.

I don't have anything against Joe's opponent. He seems like a perfectly fine man. But I know that on the issues that I believe are critical to our future, Joe Lieberman's past is good evidence of his future...He is a good man, a good Democrat, and he'll do you proud."
   
”

On July 28, Lieberman started airing a TV ad featuring Clinton's endorsement. Since Lieberman's loss in the Democratic primary, however, both Bill and Hillary Clinton have announced their support for Lamont.

On August 1, 2006, an email was sent out by College Republicans with the subject "Unconventional Primary Campaign Opportunity (LIEBERMAN)".[85]

   
“
 Incumbent Senator Joe Lieberman (Democratic Primary)

Lieberman is facing a tough primary fight versus far-left anti war activist Ned Lamont.

August 4-9th Primary Campaigning:

Elissa Harwood '09 (NOT A CLUB MEMBER) has organized a series of buses departing on Friday August 4 from Washington DC (6:30 Foggy Bottom Metro) and NYC, destination: Hartford, CT

People interested in campaigning for Lieberman in the Democratic Primary will have lodging accommodations paid for (by his campaign), as well as food and transportation.

Buses would bring you back on August 9th.
   
”

Lieberman conceded defeat in the primary to Lamont on August 8, 2006, losing by 48 percent to 52 percent.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ 2006 Senate Ratings. Cook Political Report. December 3, 2004. Last access date August 18, 2006.
  2. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/nyregion/04lieberman.html?ex=1309665600&en=b7084acf5ed65d2e&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
  3. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/library/politics/camp/080800wh-lieberman-record.html
  4. ^ http://www.yaledailynews.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=32333
  5. ^ http://www.connecticutchoicevoice.com/
  6. ^ http://www.connecticutchoicevoice.com/
  7. ^ http://www.floridabaptistwitness.com/1712.article
  8. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/07/politics/07lieberman.html?ex=1267938000&en=9c4ea5f10f7a9786&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland/
  9. ^ http://www.swingstateproject.com/2006/06/ctsen_lieberman_3.php
  10. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/20/AR2006062001439.html
  11. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5138-2001Jul16.html
  12. ^ http://www.nebraskademocrats.org/blog/59/what-lieberman-can-learn-from-ben-nelson
  13. ^ http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/03/joenertia_ii.html
  14. ^ http://www.forward.com/articles/lieberman-democrats-have-no-place-in-an-oppo/
  15. ^ http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2003046421_harrop08.html
  16. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/local/northeast/hc-pbass0604.artjun04,0,7611693.column
  17. ^ http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-black18jul18,0,7362225.story?coll=la-opinion-center
  18. ^ http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-chait7may07,0,3857801.column?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
  19. ^ http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_05/008764.php
  20. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/columnists/hc-rennie0813.artaug13,0,5201794.column?coll=hc-utility-opinion
  21. ^ http://connecticutlocalpolitics.blogspot.com/2006/04/lamont-hires-bill-hillsman.html
  22. ^ http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/06/post_239.php
  23. ^ http://www.factcheck.org/article403.html
  24. ^ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2006/07/political_video_of_the_day_ii_2.html
  25. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-12115915.apds.m0559.bc-ct--connaug12,0,5249613.story?coll=hc-headlines-local-wire
  26. ^ http://connecticutlocalpolitics.blogspot.com/2006/04/lamont-hires-bill-hillsman.html
  27. ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/08/lieberman.website/
  28. ^ http://www.joe2006.com/
  29. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-blog0809.artaug09,0,3246904.story?coll=hc-headlines-local
  30. ^ http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/8/181016/9275
  31. ^ http://www.wonkette.com/politics/top/lieberman-campaigns-website-woes-own-damn-fault-192917.php
  32. ^ http://nedlamont.com/blog/1000/well
  33. ^ http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/8/181016/9275
  34. ^ http://www.ct.gov/ag/cwp/view.asp?Q=318546&A=2426
  35. ^ http://www.wfsb.com/news/9662312/detail.html
  36. ^ http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--liebermanwebsite0810aug10,0,4156499.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut
  37. ^ http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/11/12659/4086
  38. ^ http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/10/201858/453
  39. ^ http://www.nbc30.com/news/9496790/detail.html
  40. ^ http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=4571485
  41. ^ http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2231205
  42. ^ a b http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2006/07/20/lamont_leads_lieberman_in_latest_poll/
  43. ^ http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/nation/15087004.htm
  44. ^ a b "No Big Rush to Support Lieberman" - The Hill
  45. ^ http://www.defendersactionfund.org/releases/071706b.html
  46. ^ http://www.joe2006.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=185&Itemid=28
  47. ^ http://www.ctaflcio.org/?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&HomeID=39927
  48. ^ http://www.joe2006.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=184&Itemid=28
  49. ^ http://www.joe2006.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=163&Itemid=28
  50. ^ http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/states/endorsed-candidates.html
  51. ^ http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/
  52. ^ http://www.joe2006.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=76&Itemid=28
  53. ^ http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=5231210&nav=menu29_2
  54. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-29165321.apds.m0778.bc-ct-eln--jul29,0,3213359.story?page=1
  55. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-29211236.apds.m0790.bc-ct-eln--jul29,0,4729880.story?page=1&coll=hc-headlines-local-wire
  56. ^ http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/nypost/access/1082384311.html?dids=1082384311:1082384311&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jul+24%2C+2006&author=&pub=New+York+Post&edition=&startpage=026&desc=RE-ELECT+LIEBERMAN
  57. ^ http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/opinion/editorial/scn-gt-editorial8.4aug04,0,6624167,print.story?coll=green-editorial-headlines
  58. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/29/AR2006072900680.html
  59. ^ Statement from Reid and Schumer
  60. ^ A Message from Wes Clark
  61. ^ Edwards to Stump for Lamont - New Haven Register
  62. ^ http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/op_ed/hc-weicker0517.artmay17,0,7812888.story
  63. ^ http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/local/state/hc-27154247.apds.m0504.bc-ct--senajul27,0,6851339.story?coll=hc-headlines-local-wire
  64. ^ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060729/ap_on_el_se/lieberman_s_woes
  65. ^ http://www.ctn.state.ct.us/ondemand.asp?ID=2123
  66. ^ http://www.ctn.state.ct.us/ondemand.asp?ID=2123
  67. ^ http://www.journalinquirer.com/site/printerFriendly.cfm?brd=985&dept_id=458252&newsid=17013780
  68. ^ http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--connecticutsenate0805aug05,0,594570.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut
  69. ^ http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=66514
  70. ^ http://www.now.org/press/05-06/05-16.html/
  71. ^ http://www.connecticutchoicevoice.com/
  72. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/washington/09cnd-senate.html?_r=1&hp&ex=1155182400&en=386129a0dcd5f147&ei=5094&partner=homepage&oref=slogin
  73. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/nyregion/30lieberman.html
  74. ^ http://hartfordadvocate.com/gbase/News/content?oid=oid:162481
  75. ^ http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/06/19/gore_refuses_to_back_lieberman.html
  76. ^ http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/08/stuck_between_a.php
  77. ^ http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x19276.xml
  78. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/19/nyregion/19lieberman.html?ex=1305691200&en=78db6249d8e75c76&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss
  79. ^ http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008373
  80. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/03/AR2006070300873.html
  81. ^ http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13740130/
  82. ^ http://www.nhregister.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=16887238&BRD=1281&PAG=461&dept_id=566835&rfi=6
  83. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/07/AR2006070700029.html
  84. ^ http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/ny-bc-ct--senate-connecticu0710jul10,0,3190813.story?coll=ny-linews-print
  85. ^ http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/2/14247/70377

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/e/m/Democratic_Party_primary%2C_Connecticut_United_States_Senate_election%2C_2006_9269.html"