Wikipedia:Deletion review/Template:Mills corp

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was undelete and relist. --Myles Long 17:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Mills corp

Relist. The {{tfd}} notice was put on Template talk:Mills corp, rather than the template, and as such, only one person (1.5?) voted. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Various "Mills", it's likely there would have been a number of voters had the TFD been known about. --Interiot 04:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• Relist - there's a reason we put the annoying message on the template. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 12:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Agree with SPUI, Overturn deletion, with an admonishment to the listing user to put the notice in the right place next time, undelete and relist. Once relisted I plan to suggest Keep. This was a bad deletion, a template used in this many articles should never be deleted without a clearer discussion, one comment does not consensus make..., the closing admin should not have closed at all, or should have closed no consensus. ++Lar: t/c 14:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Undelete and Relist This is a case where a slight defect in process likely had a substantial effect on the result. Users of the template deserve fair notice of the TfD. Xoloz 02:29, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Undelete process was followed here as far as I was concerned, there was just some minor kinks in it. So we are here and we undelete it and relist it :). Just another star in the night ^{T | @ | C} 04:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.