User talk:DavidCharlesII/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
Neturei Karta
Then please bring sources. You are showing a very strong Litvishe bias and you seem to be about as flexible as the average Bnei Braknik. Please be aware that this is an encyclopedia. We do not censor like the Yated Neeman does, we bring factual and verifiable information. If you can bring me a reliable source proving that NK members indeed committed chillul shabbos in Manhattan, it changes things. So far, I am forbidden from believing that information. It is loshon hora. --Daniel575 | (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Insteadn of apologizing Pinchos C has continued to abuse his powers and pick on me. Take this as a warning that I will inform Wikipedia of your continued excesses and cynical abuse of power if you do not stop. DavidCharlesII 14:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Reminder about Wikipedia's No personal attacks rule
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks such as this onemay lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 20:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Second Warning
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks such as this one may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 14:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Reminder of 3rr rule
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 17:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from making disingenuous accusations. I had to edit changes which reflected your exceedingly narrow point of view on the issues of Lubavitch. I do not believe pigs can fly. I do not believe dead people are alive. And most Jewish people do not, for that matter, either. If you cannot respect this, I strongly urge you to overcome your continuous cynical abuse of power. You have been warned. DavidCharlesII 18:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings
Please do not remove legitimate messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of legitimate communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. Thanks. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 18:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I will not remove any legitamite messages from my talk page. Because your messages are motivated solely out of malice, with the sole intent of abusing me, I cannot in good faith include your "warning" on my talk page. I would be more than glad to explain my position with a non interested third party. I cannot see how anyone would look past your obvious bad faith.
- Please refrain from posting further "warnings" on my talk page. If you cannot rest from using your bullying tactics on me, you will be reported. Thank you. DavidCharlesII 18:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 18:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am guilty of none of these charges. I merely removes illegitamite "warnings" from "commenters" whose sole motive was borne out of malice. You will be reported if you continue to abuse me. DavidCharlesII 18:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)The very fact that you continue to add these "warning" is abusive. I will not have a choice but to remove them if you continue reproducing your false charges. Please try not to abuse your power. Thank you. DavidCharlesII 18:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Also, you have no right whatsoever to remove MY comments on my talk page. Your repeated abusive tactics have been noted. DavidCharlesII 18:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
