User talk:Dave2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Dave2
Yay Dave2! User:Luigi30 (Ταλκ) 15:38, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] GNAA article
It appears that I am being reverted somewhat senselessly. However, in the interests of fair play I would like to ask whether you think my my additions to the article are relevant, neutral and informative. Am I being unreasonable to add this material? Chocolateboy has added very little the talk page, and appears to have "camped" on the article, and not let anyone else contribute to it. I would very much appreciate your feedback! - Ta bu shi da yu 11:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- I can't really see anything wrong with them. The only problem I can think of is that the wording of "The terms "Association of America" is" is a bit awkward, mixing plural and singular (I'd probably change terms -> term); certainly nothing revert-worthy. --Dave2 11:59, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Cool... I'll look into sorting that soon. - Ta bu shi da yu 05:25, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Stardock/Uplink
Given that Introversion are still their own publisher, and thus the only link to Stardock is North-American publishing, I don't feel that the {{stardock}} template should be applied to the Uplink article. It makes it seem that Stardock have a much more involved role to have such a huge template, just for the NA publisher. --Dave2 12:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I put it there because it is a member of the template, as to be complete I believe the template should have all TotalGaming.net games (not just the ones developed by Stardock, which are about 1/4 of them), but I can see your point. If you think it is not valid then you should remove it and I will not re-add without further evidence of involvement with the development.
- Oh, and hello to a fellow (past) Bath citizen! :-) I was in the class that graduated a year ago (although from the uni, not the college). GreenReaper 13:39, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- I've also adjusted Template:Stardock to show a difference between the games developed and published by Stardock. GreenReaper 14:34, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- Continued on User talk:GreenReaper#Stardock/Uplink
[edit] Thanks for your support
Hey there! Thanks a lot for your support on my RfA. Sam Hocevar 17:13, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] No such thing as OGG autio format?
What exactly do you mean when you say that there's no such thing as an OGG audio format, and that it's just a container? I'm talking about your edit in the MaSu article. -D14BL0
- Basically, Ogg isn't a codec; Vorbis is. Ogg is a standardised file format to contain multimedia data, but it doesn't actually specify what the data is; Vorbis is its most common contents, but there are also Ogg files which are a combination of Vorbis audio and Theora video - for example, Systm distributes Ogg Theora files. FLAC also supports Ogg output, whereby it's FLAC data in an Ogg container. Theoretically I guess you could even put MP3 data in an Ogg container, unless there's some technical reason stopping it. Hopefully this made sense, and I've not just confused you. --Dave2 18:39, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
