User talk:Dandurham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Wesdurham.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wesdurham.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit conflict on Wes Durham
Foreward: if you are not involved in this (due to the nature of IP addresses being dynamic), sorry for bothering you. The following is copied from Talk:Wes Durham#Edit conflict on Wes Durham:
I have only just noticed this, but after looking at the history, there's a slow (~1-5 days per rv) but ongoing edit conflict between LBronstein (talk • contribs) and who I am assuming is Dandurham (talk • contribs); the latter acting under IPs 71.32.90.238 (talk • contribs) and 71.35.184.9 (talk • contribs). This edit conflict is not healthy and it needs to stop right now. Now, usually, I'd just revert the vandalous (sp?) addition, but LBronstein (talk • contribs) appears to be acting in good faith, providing the article with good facts. Now, if you kids don't clean up your act and negotiate what parts are encyclopedic, this is going to get ugly, and you're both going to get banned. As the founder of the Georgia Tech WikiProject, I like to see people contributing to GT-related articles such as this one. If you both get banned, articles I'm interested in don't improve. While it's true that neither of you have edited articles not related to someone with the last name of Durham, I would hope that you two are more interested in Wikipedia and would be willing to contribute to the many related articles, or any articles for that matter. A happier, healthier encyclopedia, so to speak.
That being said, you two need to respectfully talk this out. Use the talk page to collaborate on improving the article, in a way you can both appreciate. Look at the articles of other American sports announcers to get ideas on how to improve this article, especially if you find one that is a Good Article or a Featured Article. I'm also going to post this on the talk pages of the users and IPs in question, but I want you two to respond on the talk page of the Wes Durham article. We'll see where it goes from there. Remember, be polite, assume good faith and no personal attacks. Thank you. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
By the way, thank you for creating Wes Durham. :) —Disavian (talk/contribs) 07:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
