User talk:DanB DanD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:DanB DanD/Archive 1

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded to to DanB DanD for countering vandalism, rolling back the tides of bias and ignorance, and general all-round good work, and in some of the most difficult subjects, at that. Herostratus 03:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Anti-feminism 2 see also 3 Brilliant 4 Antifeminism and other related articles

[edit] Anti-feminism

Dan this entire article is a collection of weasel-worded opinions. There are no clear definitions here, no reference texts, and no sources for the concept itself. Please be fairminded when you revert content.

Why did you post to my talk page's archive? I have moved the discussion to the current page.

Anyway, I deleted your content because it talked about the article it was in, not because of POV issues.

DanB†DanD 23:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] see also

I have no intention of making a point of this, I just think that it makes no sense to delete those "see also" links from the child sexuality article, since that sexuality does not happen in a vacuum and has no boundaries other than arbitrarily imposed ones. Haiduc 05:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Assuming that sexuality has no boundaries, a link to the article West Edmonton Mall is probably also relevant to the sex life of some young lad or lass out there. However, lengthy "see also" lists are unhelpful, and I think the links I added are the most relevant to the subject. DanB†DanD 05:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Dan, that's so out of left field it makes me think you are mad at me about something. If I pissed you off, I am sorry. Like I said, this is not an issue, but it does almost look like we are making a prescriptive list, rather than a descriptive one. Anyway, have a nice Thanksgiving. Haiduc 14:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

No, I'm not mad at you. I think the links list is more descriptive of the article topic now than it was before, and I think POV lists can be avoided by sticking to closely-related topics, rather than choosing from among the large number of tangentially-related topics. DanB†DanD 17:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brilliant

This is one of the best diffs I've ever seen anywhere, in any article: [1]. It didn't occur to me, but of course your links are the appropriate ones, not the old links. Cheers! Herostratus 05:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Well thank you :) DanB†DanD 08:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antifeminism and other related articles

DanB I am willing to work with you about your POV concerns. However, I will fight all attempts to revert my edits without reasonable discussions on the discussion pages. This article resembled a radical feminists rant when I arrived here with double speak definitions (eg defining a dissenting feminist or other critic of feminist ideology as an anti-feminist with no basis other than slander) typical to totalitarian tyrannies. That is MY POV concern. What are your specific POV issues? (drop in editor)