Talk:Dan Dugan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Still a crappy article, but I removed a lot of the baloney, including in particular the references to Sune Nordwall's web sites, which it has long since been agreed in discussion at the other Steiner/Waldorf/anthroposophy-related articles on wikipedia are inadmissible sources. It needs some other references now, but I'm too disgusted to continue right now. The people responsible for the endless propaganda on wikipedia regarding Waldorf/anthroposophy and Rudolf Steiner could care less whether their sources are kosher or not - as long as they can get away with it, they'll keep adding them in.DianaW 04:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree. I'm prepared to file a request for deletion unless this article goes more in the direction of Dan Dugan's primary accomplishments (audio-engineering). It is, at this point, a platform for propaganda and POV pushing (as if we needed yet another such platform in the area of Waldorf education). I'll be filing a deletion request unless Dan, for some reason, wants the article to remain here (he did, apparently, add one edit early on). Pete K 18:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of libelous rant by Sune Nordwall.

I have removed libelous text posted by Sune Nordwall. Nordwall appears to be looking for any opportunity to attack me because he is offended by my activities in support of the non-profit PLANS. The language he posted parallels libelous language he has on his own web site. It's all off-topic for Wikipedia.

-Dan Dugan Dandugan1 17:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if calling an article 'libelous' constitutes a threat of legal action against Wikipedia. — goethean ॐ 20:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if putting Wikipedia in possible legal jeopardy is banable offense. Pete K 03:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)