User talk:Dammit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 VWN en WCN 2 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 3 Edit_conflict 4 Please read edit summary before reverting 5 Avro Tutor 6 Speedy deletion 7 S-300 8 Aeronautics Defense Pages 8.1 Follow up question 9 About the page deletion 10 J-11

[edit] VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 13:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Strategic Defense Initiative Organization Mr. Roboto Country Boys Roman Catholicism in the United States Vympel R-37 Sukhoi Su-30 Ballistic Missile Defense Organization Ronald T. Kadish Soviet Anti-Air Defense Northwestern United States Russian Federation Air Force United States technological and industrial history OH! Mikey Near Field Infrared Experiment TOPGUN Great Lakes region (North America) North Asia Chipotle Mukluk

Cleanup S-400 Royal Saudi Air Force History of United States continental expansion Merge Digital audio workstation Military aircraft Sport pilot certificate Add Sources Newman Central Catholic High School List of U.S. state birds List of U.S. state minerals, rocks, stones and gemstones Wikify Pornography in the United States Footman Wars The Ultimate Enemy Expand Tupolev Tu-95 Visual arts of the United States SEPECAT Jaguar

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit_conflict

Dammit, accident. Thanks for telling me. -- Mac Davis] ⌇☢ ญƛ. 10:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please read edit summary before reverting

I have noticed that you reverted the removal of an obviously false quote attributed to George H Bush on Iran Air Flight 655. Just because a quote is attributed to someone on a website that doesn't make it an authorative source. One of the "sources" cited is from Newsweek, but with no link to the original article. Searching through Newsweek's archive received no matches. Furthermore, a search on LexisNexis (which indexes stories from over 20,000 news sources and goes back over 100 years) also came up with no matches. I would say it's very safe to say that it's a hoax. UbberM 09:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

To me an exact issue of News Week beats some search engine that indexes it. But since I don't have access to it, I'll leave it this way. And I had read your edit summary, I just didn't agree with it and find it very rude that you assume I did not. - Dammit 09:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Avro Tutor

Thanks for the well intentioned addition of flag graphics and country references for this article, however I have reverted it because these tags assume present rather than historical information, leading to idiocies (e.g. the People's Liberation Army Air Force did not purchase the Avro tutor during the 1930s).

---

thanks for your reply. Agree the list would be better more organised but didn't have time. Question mark before was the notation I was used to to indicate query. I know of a bookwith the answers and at some point I'll patch it up - whole article is a stub thrown together in a hurry when I realised there wasn't one for what was a significant aircraft. :-). Winstonwolfe 04:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion

Thanks; I wasn't sure how to indicate that they were ready for deletion. Hgilbert 10:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] S-300

S-300 is a very advanced weapon system and I think I would have known about it if there were any in the Polish Army. If you have any doubts you can ask a polish wikipedian Joymaster (This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English) who is a professional soldier and works in an anti-aircraft regiment. Mieciu K 21:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aeronautics Defense Pages

Dammit, I am currently working for Aeronautics Defense Systems, posting their product info on WikiPedia. How can I do this and avoid copyright violations which you have flagged me for. I have permission from ADF so how can I procede? Please let me know, I am new to this. ariel@compucall.co.il

[edit] Follow up question

If I remove the pictures will that be enougth to remove the copyright warning? I think i can obtain pictures which don't apear on the ADF website also when I was making the ADF pages i looked at [1] and they use wording and pictures direct from their web site? Why was I flagged while they aren't? Would it be enough to post a GDFL license on the ADF website? ariel@cmpucall.co.il

[edit] About the page deletion

Go ahead.Fongzhikangwikipedia 11:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] J-11

I removed merging reference from Su-27 article. The discussion clearly agree on oppose. Plus China not so long ago stated that all their fighters(including J-11) will include domestically developed engines(google "WS-10a"). Plus they actively developing radar technology. At the end we have a chance to see J-11 where only russian technology would be airframe design(itself maid in China). TestPilot 20:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)