User talk:Dalek356
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Dalek356
[edit] AfD Nomination: Dalek356
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Dalek356 meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalek356. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. VoiceOfReason 23:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Famguy1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Famguy1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Family Guy: Confusion Over Seasons
If you want to discuss "Confusion Over Seasons" about Family Guy that's perfectly fine and appropriate, but not in the midst of the article. Please use the associated talk page to reach consensus over what belongs in the article, and then if you wish write up the article content in encyclopedic form. This means not using the first person to discuss the process you used to arrive at the info; just present the info and document it. Sorry to be heavy handed but first-person narratives in the middle of a popular article are a bit jarring. Feel free to post on my talk page if you have any disagreement. Regards, PhilipR 22:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
