User talk:CyberAnth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page!
Contents |
[edit] Talk Archives
[edit] My Sandboxs
[edit] Welcome to the AMA
Hello CyberAnth. I am Wikiwoohoo 18:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC), deputy co-ordinator of the AMA. I wanted to say extend my thanks to you for joining the AMA. Just a note, the association's current meeting is now on at AMA Meeting/December 2006. If you would like to comment on any of the ongoing discussion then you are very welcome to. I hope to see you around. Wikiwoohoo 18:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dominion of Melchizedek
Greetings: I looked again at your info but thought you were an admin. If you are not an admin, then I wish you would first rework the article before pushing for the admins only as you are new to the DOM debate and could give it a rewrite with your fresh perspective. Otherwise, there might be less chance for improvement if frozen where it is. I wish someone like you was available to adopt me when I first started at Wikipedia. I didn't know there was an adpotion policy then, or even that I needed to be adpoted. Cheers, Harvardy 06:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- You really do need to bow out of this, for your own sake and the article's. At least bow out, be completely silent, until March 2007. Let it go. It is to your advantage. I can tell you with a great degree of certainty that any bias in the article is very largely because of your presence. Hear that. You are simply inflaming other editors to the article's disadvantage. Let me be clear I am not on anyone's side in this, except Wikipedia's. I will do my best to make the article much better per stringent adherence to Wikipedia policies over the next few months if you bow out as I described. Otherwise, I can leave you to continue with your headache-giving tactics, that are most certainly going to be for the very vast-most part continually unsuccessful anyways. Peace and farewell. CyberAnth 07:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Due to what I've seen thus far, I'm out. Peace and farewell. Harvardy 16:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Johnski socks
Can you please block FairHair. Far from disappearing, Johnski is continuing to use the account to vandalise Empire of Atlantium. FairHair's reverts are identical to Harvardy's. --Gene_poole 23:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wish i could but I am not an admin. :-) CyberAnth 00:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Oh - sorry - I just assumed you were. --Gene_poole 00:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Yea, sorry if I may have gave that impression. I sure did not try to, if I did. I am just trying to assume some leadership on the DoM page, not at all because I am any better than anyone else, but simply because the regular editors there have been in a really long and tiring battle and I can perhaps serve them and the article with a needed new set of eyes. Okay? CyberAnth 09:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Hey no problem - I really appreciate you jumping in to help. Trying to deal with Johnski and his sockpuppet army is like wading through molasses - slow, messy and entirely pointless. --Gene_poole 01:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- LOL. Ugh! That word picture really "sticks". :-) CyberAnth 06:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Prick
Your link "Prick" points to "Dickhead", but that article doesn't exist. perhaps you want to direct your readers to the wiktionary entry? --Davidkazuhiro 12:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Advice
Hey Cyber Anth,
I've been looking through articles relating to audio engineering, and noticed that in general they are quite cluttered and disorganized. I wanted to start organizing the categories better etc., but 1. I don't know how to recommend merging categories and 2. I'm unsure when it comes to organizing things since it seems that groups of wikipedians take this on instead of individuals.
The specific categories I wanted to suggest for merging were Sound technology and Audio engineering. I'd probably start a wikiproject to organize articles pertaining to audio engineering (which includes mixing and producing audio signals for recorded medium, events and broadcast.) but I'm not sure if there's some protocol of if I can just go ahead and list the project on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikiProject
I was looking at the list of categories to try to fit into and the closest project on there was Audiovisual telecommunication... but that's not really the topic I'm interested in. Sorry if I sound naive and all, I haven't delved into this part of wikipedia yet. Since you had the "Looking to Adopt" tag on, I guessed you'd be in the mood to help out :P. So if you have any pointers or could point me to wikipedians you know who are actively dedicated to this topic, please go for it. --Davidkazuhiro 22:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I went ahead and made a wikiproject page Wikipedia:Professional sound production Tell me what you think. I'm not too sure of where to go from here though. --Davidkazuhiro 00:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)