User talk:Cuke monster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How do I revert article that have been vandalized?
|
Contents |
[edit] Feel the need to Vandalize?
If you feel the need to vandalize User's Talk Pages, please vandalize HERE. Thank you!!! =-P SIGN YOUR USER NAME, REAL NAME, OR IP ADDRESS IF YOU CHOOSE. VANDALISM:
i do want to.....say HI! to my sister whos kewl and is a great cellist
ok ok fine. I dont personally like you, cuke, but i will keep that off of Wikipedia. I want to know HOW you knew i was pretending to be you with my IP. In any case, I apologize for what i did and i am no longer doing it. <=( Can u forgive me? Hope so. Wanna...i dunno...be friends? =) I guess i was jealous that you have such a clean record on wikipedia, lol.) =D--67.185.26.89 05:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
you answer my help last day. my problem: there are some participant who makes changes about anti-turkish/ turkey. and they dont allow the changes. and they specially makes propaganda of a group with additions and footnotes in sentences. what can i do?--Qwl 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why would it would be deleted
Well lets see first I did a article about there manager and in 1 day it was deleted in one day man --Yowiki 05:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism warnings
Hi, I noticed that you might be having some problems with the "-n" vandalism warnings. The proper syntax is to simply add the article name in question after including "|", as in {{subst:test-n|article name}}. Test templates without the "-n" modifier are also appropriate, since most of the time the user/vandal/ip will be aware of exactly which of their actions prompted the warning. Good luck with vandal hunting! ˉˉanetode╦╩ 04:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Mediation
I would advise you to read Wikipedia:Mediation_Committee#Nominations_for_mediator for more information; nothing is officially required, though we usually prefer to see some previous experience in Wikipedia dispute resolution. Could I also politely request that you reconsider your nomination? While we always appreciate enthusiastic candidates, mediators usually have much more experience than you currently have on Wikipedia. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- On that note, I thought I should mention that I concur with Flcelloguy. We generally require much more experience from a mediator before allowing them onto the committee. It's absolutely nothing personal. If you'd take a look at some of the other nominations that have been rejected, you'll notice that this is a common rejection reason. I also noticed that you blanked your nomination page. I'm just letting you know that I undid that, and I moved it properly to the archives of requests, where it belongs. Thanks, and have a nice day. ^demon[omg plz] 04:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Dave Bautista
I wasn't asking you to stop. I was telling you, the creator of the thread, and everyone else who responded to stop because WP:TPG explicitly says, "Talk pages are not for general conversation. Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal." I deleted the entire thread. Talk pages aren't for discussing anything related to the article subject. They are for discussing ways to improve the article and nothing else. -- THLRCCD 04:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
"Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal." I'm sorry if I came across too strongly. The reason I came after you was because you just decided to ignore me, or "disregard my last request" as you said. Though it fits into Wikipedia policy, people try their best to not delete any discussions from talk pages other than vandalism. When I run into this kind of discussion I ask everyone involved in the discussion to stop, and if they don't, then I delete it. It was a general statement, not one meant towards you. I didn't go after the poster because he/she was an anon, and anons don't understand Wikipedia policy as well as we are supposed to. It doesn't matter if you are the original poster or not; Wikipedia policy forbids using talk pages as a forum. Now that this policy has been brought to your attention, I hope that you will choose to follow it in the future. Making friends is fine, but use your own talk page, or theirs. See the members list for WP:PW, many people on that list share your interests, and even I would be willing to be your friend. This is nothing personal; I'm just trying to enforce policy. I hope that you haven't taken it that way. Cheers, -- THLR 16:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
