Talk:Cris Ericson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi! I'm having trouble uploading a photo. If you know how to do it, send me an e-mail and I'll e-mail you back with a photo attached, OK? crisericson@ispwest.com http://crisericson.com
[edit] Neutrality
Having just come accross this article, it does seem a little one-sided, possibly because it was written by the subject. There is a lot of information supporting her policies, but very little to balance the viewpoint. Hut 8.5 18:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blanking
You cant delete a wikipedia article by blanking it. If you want to delete the article you can go hereWikipedia:Articles for deletion, follow the instructions and get a vote on whether it should be deleted, SqueakBox 19:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Continual Blanking
- If there is an issue with the picture it can be removed, but the text can be left - see rv history. Pete Orme 14:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
From the talk page of the latest Cris Ericson IP:
- Your recent edits could give other users the impression that you may consider legal or other 'off-wiki' action against them. Please note that this is strongly discouraged under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats are often blocked indefinitely until their legal case is withdrawn or resolved. Please try to keep a cool head and work positively with other editors. Thanks. --Calton | Talk 14:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey Vermonters, ain't it great? This wack job could have been YOUR senator (and governor too!)
Well of course we dont know who is doing the blanking but I personally consider that the FBI would react similarly to her threats as to the way wikipedia does. The idea that the FBI is there to protect her vanity and her right to promote marijuana is somewhat mistaken I would have thought. If she actually made the effort to discover how wikipedia works instead of trying to involve the FBI in her lazy cant be bothered to figure anything out approach things would go better for her. When the FBI come knocking on my door I will show them this edit; Cris isnt the only one with a reputation to protect. But she really should have read the wikipedia blurb before submitting any photo as she would then have discovered that the photo she submitted no longer belongs to her as it was released under GNU. The FBI might charge her with wasting their time but they certainly wont be charging anyone else in this case, lol, SqueakBox 16:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- The irony is that the main source of complaint is that the picture has been vandaslised to add "puffy eyes". However a quick check of the file history shows a user id identical to the page name made the one and only upload - and checking the talk page only after requesting instructions on how to add the file!! (I'm not clear on how this helps the pro-drugs cause!) Seriously, I still believe the IP address breaking three revert rule should be blocked. Pete Orme 16:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Clear case of vandalism and that is what she should be blocked for though she appears to have a changing ip address, SqueakBox 16:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Politics and government work group articles | Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Stub-Class biography articles | Automatically assessed biography articles | Automatically assessed biography (politics and government) articles