Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right is a manuscript written by the German philosopher Karl Marx in 1843. Unpublished during his lifetime, it is a manuscript in which Marx comments on Hegel's book Elements of the Philosophy of Right paragraph by paragraph. One of Marx's major criticisms of Hegel in the manuscript is the fact that many of his dialectical arguments begin in abstraction. This work contains Marx's remark that religion is the "Opium of the People", and also contains the formulations of Marx's particular alienation concept, which was informed by Feuerbach's work.
[edit] External links
Really MARX SAYS AS UNDER "Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man—state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d'honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. [Emphasis added] The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo." SO MANY WRITER'S MISSINTERPRETED THIS SENTENCES AND MISQUATED TOO. READERS ARE REQUESTED TO READ THE ARTICLE ORIGINALLY.