From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.
Request reason: "God know why my account is blocked. This admin is out of control to block this account, out of the blue, with out any good reason, other then two, very bias editors, goaded him it to do it. It seems that Whikpedia concept of AGF is just another lie, half truth, and failed dream. I CALL TO TASK TO SHOW PROOF of you accusation I'm a "sockpuppet"."
Decline reason: "Looking at your contribs it does seem that the connection is very likely. The "proof" that you are asking for is called checkuser - it determines if anyone else is using your IP lately. If this block was made in accordance with it I'm afraid the results of such could not be disclosed due to privacy policy. On the side, ALL CAPS doesn't really get people very motivated :o -- Tawker 00:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This is cyber-Kafka Franz Kafka, see Catch-22 (logic). Use the check user and find out this IP is used by hundreds of others. CAPS are used to express MY RAGE and MY ANGER with the LACK of FAIRNESS this PROCESSS HAS...
NOW. The idea of WP:AGF is a joke and this process to address this wrong shows terrible contempt and bad faith, wikipeida has for people.
It's no-wonder why people are trying to destroy it. It's unfairness, drives people to "get right". Also, the damage it does to people's reputations will not go unaswered for much longer.
Very foolish.Creamofwheaton 02:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
