Talk:Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
This article is covered by WikiProject LGBT studies, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to LGBT issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class.
Peer review Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Country Music, which is a project dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to country music. If you would like to participate or learn more about the project please visit the project page, where you can join and see a list of open tasks to help with.
Former FA This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Contents

[edit] Expansion

The article needs (per Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other):

  • To get rid of the weasel word "Most sources speculate about the potential success of the song" in the Possible reception section.
  • basic facts such as sales figures, release date, and which record charts the song has appeared on

Hyacinth 12:53, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] File

The articles I have read describe the song as available as an MP3 from iTunes, not an M4P. Hyacinth 11:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Those articles are incorrect. I have the actual song file from iTunes and it is indeed an m4p (AAC) file. iTunes offers no other format, nor does any other online store offer the song. Cjmarsicano 19:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
In reality though, M4Ps are MP4s. -- Zanimum 01:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article nomination has failed

The Good article nomination for Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other has failed, for the following reason:

It looks generally very good and suitable for listing on GA, but the expansion tag should either be addressed or removed before it can be listed. One suggestions I'd make, though, is to not have a quote from a magazine in the very first sentence - just describe what the article is about and save quotes for later on, otherwise it looks somewhat like a fan piece. Worldtraveller 00:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Both quotes simply describe the song without being positive, so I'm not sure how they would make the article look like a "fan piece".
More importantly, are you saying that attempting to address the impediments to this being a featured article means that it can't be a good one? Isn't that what good articles are? Hyacinth 21:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
See Henry Cowell. Hyacinth 00:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "He Was a Friend of Mine"

"He Was a Friend of Mine' is credited to McGuinn/Traditional, it seems likely that this is where Nelson heard it, and it does not sound like a blues song. Perhaps we could call it a folk standard also performed by the Byrds? Hyacinth 21:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Called it "traditional". Hyacinth 21:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article nomination has passed

The Good article nomination for Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other has passed.

I found it well written, everything was referenced, and basically a good article.

Thankyoubaby 16:20, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree. I was skeptical at first, but it's an interesting read and well cited. Nice job! Kafziel 16:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Similar songs"

Seems to me neither of the songs listed there are at all similar; I'm considering striking this section, as the analysis seems OR. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 03:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Featured article candidate

This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

[edit] Future sources

Hyacinth 14:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)