Talk:Council Shoulder Patch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scouting Wiki Project Council Shoulder Patch is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Merge/redirect

The formal name is Council Shoulder Patch (CSP), and is already covered in Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America and the collecting article (can't remember the name offhand). Recommend redirect to Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

That would be Scouting memorabilia collecting. Agree with redirect. Rlevse 11:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
support merge as per Ed. Chris 15:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation

  • This article was created by a newby with little familarity with wiki scouting. Does it make any sense to make it a {{disambig}} page? --evrik 13:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
A dab page is used when one name may apply to many things. I'm not sure how that would apply here- please elaborate. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:07, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Patch collecting is a big hobby big business ... have one part of the dab point to collecting and one to the uniform article. --evrik 15:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
This isn't a forum for promoting business. By this rational, we would dab lodge flap and every other bit of insignia. However, the insignia and collecting articles should have statements that link to the other. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 15:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • edited my statement as it was taken too literally. --evrik 16:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
No worries ;-) --Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)