User talk:Cormac Canales

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for creating Mighty Max; I'm fifteen now and haven't thought about Max for probably eight. Thanks for making me laugh. Good job, keep up the good work! Good luck, and good day._{Peace Profound!} --Merovingian✍Talk 22:09, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Contents 1 Russian Blue 2 Alfred Rosenberg 3 Image:Moon10272004 001.jpg listed for deletion 4 Hi

[edit] Russian Blue

MedCould you please confirm the copyright status of Image:Russian_blue_cat_453.jpg, it appears to be from [1] and is most likely copyrighted, did you get permission from the owner? Boffy b 23:02, 2004 Aug 18 (UTC)

• Got your message, I'v taken the image off the page and listed it on Wikipedia:Copyright_problems. Don't worry, but in future check Wikipedia:Image use policy or Wikipedia:Copyrights if you'r unsure. Boffy b 17:26, 2004 Aug 19 (UTC)

[edit] Alfred Rosenberg

Can you confirm where you got Image:Alfred rosenberg 1933.jpg exactly? You said that it was From the book "Myth of the Master Race" by Cecil. Is that the book cover (the copyright tag {{bookcover}} is appropriate then) or this is from a part of the book, which may make it copyrighted? If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page. --Ricky81682 (talk) 08:51, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Moon10272004 001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Moon10272004 001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Even assuming that only people "people with little understanding of science would consider it" falsifiable, then we have to accomodate people with little understanding of science. I would dispute the suggestion in any case. Weak agnosticism acknowledges falsifiability, for example, (I don't know, but I could know). I'll change theory back to belief if you like but "generally considered" belongs as a qualifier. Marskell 18:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Belief is better. Even a believer would probably agree ;). Marskell 18:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)