Talk:Corsham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to places in the UK. If you wish to contribute you can visit the project page where there are resources & guidelines, to do lists and discussions.	United Kingdom Portal
This article has been rated "B" on the Wikipedia Version 1.0 quality scale.
On the project page you can find detailed guides on how to write about counties and settlements, as well as where to find statistics, references and other useful things. Additionally, the following has been identified as specific improvements this article needs: Cite sources using Wikipedia:Footnotes Local and historic maps Add a link to Wikipedia's mapping tools Add more photos Write a section on transport Write a section on education Expand the section on economy, including: the Bath Stone industry the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom) retail the wool industry Statistics such as visitor numbers, GDP, tourist revenue and unemployment trends if available Write a section about religion Write a section about local government Add other census data

Contents 1 Questions 2 To do 3 Infobox 4 Article quality 5 Merge from Corsham Railway Cutting

[edit] Questions

• Corsham is not listed in the List of towns in England. Is there a source for the claim to be a town?. -- Chris j wood 11:14, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Yes - here (scroll down to the first paragraph of thumbnail history - 'Corsham is a small town in a...'). It's... Thelb4! 18:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] To do

I have added a new to do list (at the top). I invite you to claim items that you want to spend some time on, and be bold in adding new material to the article. Click this watch link to watch the to do list. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox

This infobox {{Infobox England place}} looks the most appropriate. Lets fill it out, then paste it into the article. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Could we have the photograph in the infobox, and the location map as a separate illustration further down the article? I think the photo is a more striking and interesting way to start the article? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Done. All we need now is the population. Thanks for lending your expertise, Steinsky. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Got the population, and posted the infobox. Thanks again! --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article quality

Now we have the infobox and an overview of the key features of the district, I think this is a B-Class article. I have changed the box above - but is it right for me to tag it myself (I did a little of the work) or is there a place to ask an outside editor to review and tag it?

A few more to the 'to do' list attempted, and it could go for Good Article review. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merge from Corsham Railway Cutting

That article consists of one sentence and some links. I think both articles will benefit from moving the material here. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Corsham Railway Cutting is part of a systematic listing of all Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and is I think best left alone. Rwendland 23:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)