Talk:Conquer Online

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: X-Men vs. Street Fighter Expand: New CVG Articles, List of Nintendo trademarks, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: Super Transformation, Turok: Dinosaur Hunter, Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games, Yoshi, Black Isle's Torn, Rise of Nations, Kirby (Nintendo), PlayStation 3, Mega Man Zero 4, Luigi Cleanup: Shiny Entertainment, Age of Mythology, Serious Sam II, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Ted Price, Betrayal at Krondor, Little Fighter 2 Merge: Current Events (Update needed!) / Deletions / Essential articles / Workshop / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

This article was nominated for deletion on November 12, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Contents 1 Rebirth 2 Bias 3 Grammar 4 Things to add 5 Notability not asserted 6 Problem with the system requirements 7 Conquer is Notable!

[edit] Rebirth

If someone could add a section on rebirth, that would be swell. I'd do it, but I'm tired after rewriting the entire article ;). -- Rediahs 08:39, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bias

Last time I read this, the article was a little bias to the archer as the best class. IT is not the best class, even though it can level faster than most classes. its considered to be weaker than the tao(which is my character type, but i personally chose it to be one of the better class's since it has increased attack and it has the range) on dream. My tao is only level 79 and it can take out a level 90 archer, do more damage than it, and have more health than it. Half-life guy Half-life is the dumbest mo-fo s**t ever!!!!

Yeh archers pretty much suck 69.167.179.163yo mamma sucks good!

I don't find it biased in archers being the "best" class. I do, however, find it biased in many other areas, which I've been trying to clean up, but I am only one person here. Bad grammar NEEDS to be removed or reworded. And comments such as "The unhelpful GMs" should never occur here.

I think the problem is that most of the people editing this page are from Conquer's fanbase, which mostly consists of little kids... we need more encyclopedic people here. -- Rediahs 23:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah that might be the problem... but if you re-read the paragragh it does clearly state that an archer levels the fastest, are the better hunters, best at power leveling. That is not true in some cases. If, say, some one goes to mystic castle to get power leveled, they would want a warrior or a trojan to do it for them. For hunting, fire circle does about the same thing as scatter, only its stronger. Also who ever said that they are the only ones trying to clean this article point of view problem, your not the only one who is trying to clean it up... people like Rediahs and I are trying our best to help. Half-life guy

I think i fixed most of the grammer problems in the warrior paragraph. If its not fixed, just shoot me! Oh and who deleted the reflect information in that paragraph... that skill is a very good one that should be in there.Half-life guy

It was me, and I said that "I am only one person here". Read it carefully. :) My message spanned two paragraphs. By the way, you indent again for another reply. Think of email. -- Rediahs 21:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

ahh, im sorry for the misunderstanding... Talk to you later Rediahs Half-life guy

I have re-written about half the article, up to about the water taoist section, in both clean up and to attempt to remove the NPOV dispute. Discuss whether this has been acheived - is there a justification to remove the warning? I will finish my re-write tomorrow. Comments appreciated - it may now need further correction. Ale_Jrb 21:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grammar

Some people who have been editing this article have been introducting horrible grammar and spelling mistakes to the article.

I'd just like to ask that, if you are going to add content to this article, please do one of these things:

a) Run a spellcheck on your addition, and proofread it several times for grammar.
b) If english is not your native language or you just aren't very good at grammar, get a more literate friend to review your changes before you enter them.
c) Finally, you can't do either of the above things reasonably well, or can't produce an encyclopedia-quality article, please completely refrain from adding to the article.

Thanks,

Rediahs 21:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Most I think is done off translations from the chinese articles. I am not one to be an editor but it does need a cleanup. Obleku 10:19, 20 April 2006 Half life guy is the dumbest mo-fo s**t ever!!!!

Great Gatsby ~ Over this weekend, I will review and edit this entire section for improved grammar. If time allows, I will also add additional information that is lacking within this page. If possible, somebody please upload the Conquer logo. If desired you may search for my posts on the official forums for "Great Gatsby". I do not play this game anymore, but I sparingly visit the forums for entertainment.

[edit] Things to add

It would be nice if someone could add a section on marriage, obtaining a house, and mining / gem types. --Porqin 12:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• There are currently a section on gems. However, keep in mind we don't want to make the wiki article so detailed that it becomes an exact copy of the original site. --Steven 15:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Mentioning the possibility of getting married, obtaining a house (general idea) can be done in a few sentences. It isn't needed to give a walk-through on the precise steps in obtaining a house for example. --Porqin 12:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I need somone to finish up what i have done to 2nd reborn. --Webstrand 04:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notability not asserted

Hi - I'm not sure this article satisfys Wikipedia's required assertions of notability. Wikipedia isnt a game guide (see: WP:NOT). MidgleyDJ 21:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

• Whilst is is possible that some areas of the guide need rewriting, I do not believe that WP:NOT applies enough here to allow an undiscussed deletion. For notability, websites such as onrpg.com, mmorpg.com and mmosite.com hold sections for the game, which has a reasonably substantial number of players. As such, I am contesting your proposal for deletion. If you wish a deletion to still be considered, it can be listing in WP:AfD. Ale_Jrb^talk 17:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Since prodding the article I've done further googling and think the subject is notable. The trouble is 1. Notability isnt asserted in anyway in the current version of the article and 2. the article is unencyclopedic. Wikipedia isnt a game guide - and that's sadly the current version is just that - a game guide. MidgleyDJ 03:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Problem with the system requirements

Intel Pentium III 800 MHz equiv. CPU, 128 MB RAM, 16 MB or higher 3D graphics card such as GeForce 2 or better, 1 GB hard drive space, DirectX 8.1, Internet connection of at least 56 kbit/s; and DragonBalls

[edit] Conquer is Notable!

If anyone has ever logged onto the game, and notice the wide amount of players playing, they would notice that Conquer Online is actually quite notable. I suppose, for the refrences, we'll just have to look at [ignoring all rules] for the time being. Conquer Online should not be excluded from an Encyclepedia! Kopf1988 01:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

There, I ignored all rules... for about 2 minutes, then found you a couple of sources. If you need more... maybe you should look for them and use them instead of complaining that there aren't enough of them. Kopf1988 02:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)YEAAAAAAAAAH!