User talk:Computerjoe/Archive 6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Untimestamped
RFA thanks
Signpost updated for July 3rd.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 26 | 26 June 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Esperanza Elections
Thank you for your vote in the Esperanza Elections. Your support is much appreciated, and it means that I am now in the Council. I will continue to try my best, and if you have any questions or queries, please don't hesistate to leave me a message. Thanks again, — FireFox 15:44, 10 July '06
Gay tourism
My edit seemed perfectly valid, I don't see why it was changed. From the link you provided in the message, I fail to see how I *removed* information from the page. I added to it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.18.65.207 (talk • contribs).
WikiProject Community News
| Community WikiProject • News • July 2006 |
|---|
|
The Community WikiProject has had an overhaul and new developments are afoot! We are putting in place some tools for classifying, categorizing and assessing community-related content on Wikipedia. Please have a look at the Tools section on the project page. Also, the Community article has been identified by the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team as a Core Topic, one of the 150 most important articles for any encyclopedia to have. This article is undergoing a massive collaborative rewrite in which you may want to be involved! |
| You have recieved this newsletter because you are listed as a participant at WikiProject Community. |
User:Misza13's pile!
 |
Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports gathered on my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 0x0104/0x01/0x00. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on my talk page. Misza13, the rouge-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing! NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated ROT-26 algorithm. |
 |
Notice
Computerjoe, I nominated you to become an admin. Here is its content:
Computerjoe
Vote here Ending 18:19, 2006-08-18 (UTC) Computerjoe (talk • contribs) deserves to become an admin by all my standards. I first heard of him in his edit of Wikipedia:Featured Article Candidates/Micronation, and have been watching him closely since then. His contributions are very good, and has contributed to about 5000 articles since December 2005. His Wikipedia:Don't be evil inspired me to create Wikipedia:Curiosity Killed the Cat. I am honored to request adminship for him. Kitia 19:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Candidate, do you accept this nomination?:
- No I'm afraid I don't feel as if I'm ready for adminship, and shall not be accepting nominations until this time in September. Thank you, Computerjoe's talk 07:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Support:
Oppose:
Comments:
My RfA and your vote
 |
Hello Computerjoe, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I hope everything in your admin coaching goes well.....if you do give adminship another try in the future, I'll make sure to pitch in some support :). You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page.
|
WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award
Greetings, Computerjoe. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Kylu for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here.
If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)
GIen's RfA: Thank you!
 |
 Computerjoe for your Support! |
PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)
Attention Dumbass
Obviously, you're just using a bot, and aren't bothering to READ the changes you make. Knock the fascist crap off. We're here to work on an encyclopedia, not play stupid games. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.114.233.237 (talk • contribs).
Your threats are amazing. What a jackbooted brownshirt you are. My edits are sourced, linked, and proper. Cut the fascist crap. "This is a third level warning", yadda yadda yadda.
Timestamped
careful with AWB
hi there Joe. be careful with AWB, you corrected an intentionally misspelled word, here. i changed back - just be mindful that when you work fast you trade off a bit of accuracy. cheers. JoeSmack Talk 20:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oh crap :*( Sorry. Computerjoe's talk 08:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Userpage stuff.
Please refrain from removing anything on my userpage unless a) it violates policy (and even then, I'd appreciate a message on my talk page first, it is just common courtesy) or b) I agree that it needs removing.
While the fake new messages bar may be annoying by some, I like it and it does not in any way violate policy. Please ask before removing things; you know as well as I do that such edits may be classed as vandalism.
Thank you. — Nathan (talk) / 14:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- How is that vandalism? Isn't it more of a content dispute? Computerjoe's talk 14:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- A content dispute? About the content of a userpage? I don't think discussions about what someone has on their talk page have ever been called 'content disputes', but I may be wrong. There are some guidelines on the page about userpages. Nathan is definitely not the only one with such a message, and it would probably be a better idea to bring it up for discussion in general somewhere than to remove it from someone's userpage without discussion (and yeah, these messages annoy me a great deal as well, but that's another issue :)). --JoanneB 16:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Community
Hi Computerjoe! Just thought I'd let you know that the main Community article is now (finally) becoming a hot topic. Any help and input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! WP:CBTF • CQ 21:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Nonexistence AfD
I think you meant "redirect to existence". --Maxamegalon2000 23:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yep. TY! Computerjoe's talk 06:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you Computerjoe
Hi there. I would like to thank you very much for your vote in the Esperanza Elections, your trust in me was appreciated and I hope I will be able to live up to your expectations. Thanks again! Regards -- Banes 10:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Relisted AfD
Hey Computer joe, not sure if you simply forgot to do it, but I just wanted to let you know that I commented out this AfD that you relisted. Cheers, and keep up the great AfD work! --Deathphoenix ʕ 17:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 10th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 28 | 10 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Randy Johnston (‽) 04:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
VP
I could really use some help. I really like VP, I have 1.2.2 but it's almost to the point I want to stop using it because:
- I can't get an answer to User_talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs#VandalismLog
- Now more than half the time when I start it, it almost fully loads and then closes for no apparent reason
- Daniel has several times, specifically and just one example User_talk:AmiDaniel/VP/suggestions#Set_RC_limit_.28Default_edit_count.29, that he'd make a simple fix in a few days and then still hasn't done it
Any help would be appreciated. Rlevse 02:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't know. On July 13th, I think, VP 1.3 will be released - many bugs will be fixed then. Computerjoe's talk 07:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'll wait til then (1 day?) and if needed, I'll try to get him to answer me. Thanks.Rlevse 09:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
RE:Image:Sango1234
Er, it's listed for deletion but I have no clue why... care to fill me in? Master of Puppets Giant Enemy Crab! 16:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Users are allowed to have a few pictures and subpages that are "unencyclopedic"; if we deleted them all, we'd lose about 1 million images on Wikipedia. Master of Puppets Giant Enemy Crab! 18:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
User:John Snow
I issued the spam1 to John Snow but hadn't reverted his edits. I don't think he made any more after my spam1, so your spam2 might be premature yet. Sorry for my only partial editorial role. -- JHunterJ 16:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
AMA Roll Call
There is currently an AMA Roll Call going on. Please visit the page and sign your name to indicate whether or not you're still active. :-) אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 18:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
My RfA thanks
 |
Hello Computerjoe/Archive 6, and thank you for your support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life. In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grandmasterka 07:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) |
AfD
Actually, there's a new one. David Bergan 18:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 17th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 29 | 17 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Treebark (talk) 23:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup Taskforce
I added Digital rights management to your desk. The first thing needed is to figure out what needs to be done. I don't know where to start, but point me at a managable piece and I'll help. Please look at it and accept or let me know and I'll reassign. RJFJR 16:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Not on list
I'm somehow not on the list to use VandalProof? Can you fix that because you welcomed me? Dspradau 19:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Try now. Computerjoe's talk 19:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks it is working now! Dspradau 19:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award
Hi Computerjoe! You've signed up to be a judge for the Esperanza User Page Award! You'll have three user pages to examine. The user pages you get coincide with your signup number. So if you signed up to be a judge in spot 1 than you will get nominations 1-3. Pick your favorite one, and list it in the finalist section. After all 5 judges have chosen a finalist it's time to award them 1-10 points in the four categories:
- Attractiveness: general layout, considering colour scheme and/or use of tables if applicable
- Usefulness: links to subpages or editing aids, helpful information
- Interesting-ness: quirky, unique, captivating, or funny content
- General niceness: at the judges' discretion
Please see the Scores section on this page for additional information on your job as a judge.
Keep in mind that your scores are confidential! Email Banes with your scores and final picks. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced! Thanks.
May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 10:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
RE:Copyright
This is what i got from a reply e-mail:
Subject: Re: Me again. From: "Dan Vietor" <devo@ks.unisys.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "Adam Moss" <yamatocharm@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:00:24 -0400
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:41 -0700, Adam Moss wrote: > Problem- > I've learned this: > > You need Unisys to license their images under a GFDL-compliant > license, like a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license (which'd suit > their needs best). > > Is this possible?
This is probably not possible. I'll have to research it more. In general, we make images off the site free for private, non-commercial use. This is to prevent people from downloading the images from the site and using them in a subscription based web site. In other words, making money off of images they didn't not create nor had the means to create.
In doing a first reading of GFDL, it appears that the images are totally free which means they can be used commercially without paying a royalty to the person who spent time and effort creating the image.
As for the hurricane track images, it might be a no-brainer since almost anyone could create these images with the raw track data and something like Photoshop.
But I'll have to research this a bit further.
-- ________________________________________________________ Daniel Vietor Mail: devo@ks.unisys.com Unisys Corp Title: Engineer/Meteorologist 2476 Swedesford Rd B101-L Phone: 610-648-3623 Malvern PA 19355 Fax: 610-695-5524
HurricaneCraze32 21:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey Joe, what's your problem!!!!!
Hey Joe, what's your problem. Maybe you're a new-comer to wikipedia and don't know taht sometimes people start a page and then need to get a bit of text from another page to help take it forward. It is generally considered very gauche to propose a page for speedy deletion just 1 minute after it has been started. Perhaps you should spend a little bit more time in the sand box, before winding people up, eh.Harrypotter 20:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- I am sorry if you found my incisive wit a bit to petulant. Thanks for the info about removing speedy-del tags. I'm not really able to draft articles before posting them, and this should not be a problem if people wait to see if more is coming.
I hope you have a nice night too!Harrypotter 21:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Congratulations on your civility, Joe, for not biting that user's head off. I think it shows great self-control. --David Mestel(Talk) 05:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
FYI
Just so you know, I now have a new username at User:Seivad. Previously I was known as [[User::Abcdefghijklm]]. This message has been left for everyone who has left a message on my talk page . Thanks for your time, Seivad 21:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Regeneration in Balanoglossus
Removed CSD, replaced with mergeto. Cheers Clappingsimon talk 11:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, you were right, it was {{nonsense}}. SD restored. Cheers Clappingsimon talk 13:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
the link to the article
You have asked for the article and here it is. http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=83000716&blogID=144315885&MyToken=01eefc24-d497-465f-9c92-d142c51a9294
thank you for your concern. -ScotchMB 12:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Your Comment on Crisspy's RfA
You stated "WP:SNOWBALL please oppose". You may want to reword that because that could be interpreted as a request for others to oppose Crisspy's RfA (which obviously would not be a nice thing to do). I know that was not what you meant (the please probably goes with the "WP:SNOWBALL" as part of a request for someone to close the nomination before it goes out of control), but it could be interpreted that way. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks Jo. I've added a comma for clarity. Computerjoe's talk 19:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm still Jo... eh.. no it's fine. No, no, really, I'm a-okay either way. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 19:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Problem with removing a personal opinion in Adria article
Since it cannot be proved that the Prior spoke in Latin, it cannot be proved that Tomin's words are a translation. There is no evidence in the show to support that other than the fact that the Latin words and Tomin's words are the same. However, as it was specified it cannot be stated that that language was Latin, it cannot be stated that Tomin translated the Prior's words. He is more likely to have said a personal phrase. Despite this, an editor refuses to remove the Tomin's "translation". Using the talk page does not seem to have practical results.89.32.1.82 19:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- I have been lenient with you, i have helped you i have not reported you. I even changed words so things where more clearer for you. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
changed words? how can it can be said that the Prior's words indicate that Adria posseses a tremendous amount of knowledge if u cannot be sure of their meaning? how can it be stated that the Prior's words announce her divine and human nature if u cannot be sure of their meaning? you refuse to remove this statements and the Prior's words should be also removed since they are meaningless thus yet to ramble on about your lenity and tolerance. please spare me!!89.32.1.82 19:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Seems that "fair" editor finally made the edits, edits he forbade me to do under the motivation of vandalism. I'm grateful you offered to "vandalize" the page for me, editor Fenton.89.32.1.82 20:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Kelly Martin/B
Yes, you are on the list. I've just checked it out. Tyrenius 00:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
A request
I'm going to go on wikibreak for a few days from Monday, as I'm on holiday. Is it alright if I tell my clients to ask you for help if anything urgent happens while I'm away? --David Mestel(Talk) 19:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but no. I'm extremely busy next week. Computerjoe's talk 07:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. --David Mestel(Talk) 16:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Damn those internets!
See what happens when wikipedia dumps stuff on the internet? my cookies get lost!!! :) Project2501a 19:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 24th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 30 | 24 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 04:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award
Hello, Computerjoe. This is a quick message to remind you that all 5 finalists for the Esperanza User Page Award have been chosen. You now need to judge those 5 pages, awarding each one 1-10 points for attractiveness, usefulness, interesting-ness and general niceness. Refer to the Scores section at the project page if you are unsure of how to score.
Once you have scored the 5 pages, email Banes using the specified format. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced. Thanks. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 16:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia Research Survey Request
Hello, I am a member of a research group at Palo Alto Research Center (formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Wikipedia. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Wikipedia (e.g., as a member of the Mediation Cabal) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.
Parc wiki researcher 23:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
PARC User Interface Research Group
Weird...
Any idea why those I approved weren't added? I wonder if I accidently used VP1.3... hmmm - Glen 09:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Advocacy request
Heyo, Steve Caruso here. There is a Request for assistance by Danbarnesdavies (talk). Would you be willing to take their case? If you will, please leave a note and sign under the entry on WP:AMARQ and change "(pending)" in the heading to "(open)." When you're finished with the case, set it to "(closed)". If you're not able to take the case, please leave me a message on my talk page so I can continue searching for a willing Advocate. Many thanks! אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 23:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I can't do the Danbarnesdavies (talk • contribs) as this week I'm very busy guest writing at Lifehacker. Sorry. Computerjoe's talk 15:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problemo and thanks for telling me. :-) Just be sure to set your status on the Wikipedia:AMA Advocates accepting inquiries to "away" or "busy" when you're unavailable and set it back to "available" when you're up for fielding requests. :-) Peace! אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 16:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
my RfA
Cheers! - CheNuevara 17:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks from Yanksox!
 |
Hey, Joe, thanks for supporting my RfA, which registered a tally of 104/4/7. Which means...
|
 |
Do not edit past discussion on Wikipedia talk namespace
Please do not modify discussion on the Wikipedia talk namespace, as you did on Wikipedia talk:Fair use criteria/Amendment 2. -- Ned Scott 12:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Archive spelling correction
Hi, I was wondering if you could also improve spelling on my other talk archives. :) --Cat out 14:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Re:Signature
Hi - I reduce the length, but not change the color. Rama's arrow - this Fire burns always 20:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 31st
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 31 | 31 July 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof Approval Hold?
Hey, is there any reason I was moved to the approval holds list on the VandalProof registration page (almost immediately, for that matter)? While I do have way too many WP namespace edits (I'm really trying to cut back on that), I do have almost 600 mainspace edits. If it's the Acadamenorth thing, that dispute has been settled. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 14:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- The reason was because you added yourself to the approved list - you needed to add yourself to the awaiting approval list. I will review later. Computerjoe's talk 15:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof
Thanks for approving me! --Bearly541 16:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Ouch.
Wow. Good luck with that one. But, I must admit.. I'm glad somebody asked that question. And I'm also fairly glad it wasn't me. :) Friday (talk) 18:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
AFD
Okay I'll be careful Computerjoe! I'm assuming you're refering to my edit summary, which if you go back and check every afd I've ever participated in says "voting afd". Perhaps I should change it to "sharing my opinion afd" or "participating afd". :-) Stubbleboy 18:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Seiji Ueda NPOV?
You object to the use of the word "prolific"? The Ueda-Kaneda pair is ranked 14th overall [1], 7th if you discount the automated discovery systems (LINEAR et al.). Surely "prolific" is an accurate description... --Urhixidur 21:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, I've reworded Seiji Ueda. Is it to your liking? Computerjoe's talk 21:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Board candidate questions
Also, most (if not all) candidates have provided their age. Do you plan to, or do you feel uncomfortable doing so, and if so, why? Computerjoe's talk 18:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dear Computerjoe: I have absolutely no objection to providing my age at all; if I omitted it from my candidate information and it is general practice to provide it, my omission was merely an oversight, for which I apologise. I am 18 years old, and will add this to my entry on Meta. Thank you for letting me know. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Advocacy request
Heyo, Steve Caruso here. There is a Request for assistance by bongo1234 (talk) on Cake_Media. Would you be willing to take their case? If you will, please leave a note and sign under the entry on WP:AMARQ and change "(pending)" in the heading to "(open)." When you're finished with the case, set it to "(closed)". If you're not able to take the case, please leave me a message on my talk page so I can continue searching for a willing Advocate. Many thanks! (This one seems fairly simple compared to the others on the board.) אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 02:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof
Joe -- you authorized me (Alphageekpa) as a VandalProof user a couple days back (you posted notice to my talk page) -- but the application keeps telling me that I'm not authorized to use VandalProof...can you assist? Thanks in advance! Alphageekpa 18:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, you need to follow the instructions where it says 'Your log-in request failed'. I have approved you. Computerjoe's talk 18:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about second prod!
Just had too many bad experiences doing afd's. So I didn't know what to do -- probably I should have done nothing. Sorry. Mattisse 18:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for WP:DP !
I used to do that but I had some very bad experienes. It's been recommended to me, and I am taking the advice, not to get involved in afd anymore. Maybe I'll get my nerve up again in a while. Mattisse 18:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Chris Prillo
Chris Prillo has written about in accuracies in the Wikipedia on his sites and this has inspired some readers of his to keep reinserting the incorrect name of his college. user 4.21.120.135 knew he was inserting false information since he read about it on Chris's blog recently. Saying " come on don't be a jerk." to some one who is deliberately inserting false information is hardly a cutting insult.--8bitJake 20:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Your signature
It is cool... but since you started Concordia and you are a leader have you considered making that "C" dark blue and linking it to concordia? MrCEO 21:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Prod removed on future event
I'm not willing to do afd's anymore. International Bowl and New Mexico Bowl are future events and my prods have been removed on International Bowl and most likely will be on the other also. Mattisse 15:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, some future events/games/movies can be included: taking they are notable and verifiable. Computerjoe's talk 16:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Future events
O.K. I give up. Mattisse(talk) 16:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 7th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
A supportive note
Hey Computerjoe, I just saw that you decided to leave Concordia, and I wanted to give you a bit of support. You had a lot of hard times with Community Justice and then Concordia, but I was always impressed that you stuck with it the whole time. You've helped out a lot of people, and I'm sure they appreciate it. Best of luck around the rest of Wikipedia, -- Natalya 15:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
AfD Nomination: Electronic Standard Book Number
I saw your comment on the talk page, so I figured you would know more about the subject than us schleps. AdamBiswanger1 18:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- D'oh! That makes me feel smart now doesn't it? AdamBiswanger1 19:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
re: Favour
I'll be happy to take the case. Looks pretty open and shut to me. --David Mestel(Talk) 13:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Want to ask your advice on a prod/merge/redirect situation
There is a long article called AppleSearch. The creator says he does not have to follow any of Wikipedia's policies about notability, reliable sources, etc. because Apple Computer has already done that. After he removed my tags about verifying etc. I proded the article to get his attention. Now I am thinking maybe the solution is to merge the article with Apple Computer. What do you think? Or is he right? Mattisse(talk) 18:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 21:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Hey Joe, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew my RfA at 13/11/10. Thanks for the (cabalist) support and enjoy your vacation :) --james(talk) 10:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
A supportive note
Hey Computerjoe, I just saw that you decided to leave Concordia, and I wanted to give you a bit of support. You had a lot of hard times with Community Justice and then Concordia, but I was always impressed that you stuck with it the whole time. You've helped out a lot of people, and I'm sure they appreciate it. Best of luck around the rest of Wikipedia, -- Natalya 15:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
AfD Nomination: Electronic Standard Book Number
I saw your comment on the talk page, so I figured you would know more about the subject than us schleps. AdamBiswanger1 18:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- D'oh! That makes me feel smart now doesn't it? AdamBiswanger1 19:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
re: Favour
I'll be happy to take the case. Looks pretty open and shut to me. --David Mestel(Talk) 13:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Want to ask your advice on a prod/merge/redirect situation
There is a long article called AppleSearch. The creator says he does not have to follow any of Wikipedia's policies about notability, reliable sources, etc. because Apple Computer has already done that. After he removed my tags about verifying etc. I proded the article to get his attention. Now I am thinking maybe the solution is to merge the article with Apple Computer. What do you think? Or is he right? Mattisse(talk) 18:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 21:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Hey Joe, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew my RfA at 13/11/10. Thanks for the (cabalist) support and enjoy your vacation :) --james(talk) 10:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Portal:Orkney
A portal created recently by Mallimak (talk • contribs) - the Orkney Portal - has been nominated for deletion. If you wish to take part in the discussion please contribute at:
Thanks. --Mais oui! 08:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
August Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Signpost updated for August 14th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 33 | 14 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching questions
I've dropped some questions on your admin coaching page, as well as commented on some of the earlier scenarios from Lar. Hope you enjoyed your holiday :) (Working on the assumption that you won't read this until it's over.) Petros471 14:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
VP
Is Daniel still working on improving VP? It was a few months ago he said he'd have an update out after 1.2.2 and yet there's been nothing. It's hard to even get responses to problems now. I like VP, but it needs some quirks and improvements done.Rlevse 02:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yep. VP 1.3 and VP 2.0 are all under development! Computerjoe's talk 11:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
AHAH
You haven't finished the AfD process on this page. I would, but I don't know your reasons for nominating the page. If you have changed your mind, could you please remove the Afd notice? (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- I was off completing it while (aeropagitica) was talking here, so it is now up, but with no reason. Yomanganitalk 16:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 21st
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 34 | 21 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola i870
Please don't snowball keep AfDs. WP:SNOW has no real weight, and it only ends up being divisive. Furthermore, to cite precedents is entirely against out no binding decisions guideline. This article meets no speedy keep criteria, so please reconsider your close and others like it for the future. --badlydrawnjeff talk 10:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- I was waiting to see how long this would take :P Frankly, feel free to revert my closure. For a start, I am not an admin and I was kinda pushing it. However, this article had a snowball's chance of getting deleted, and it seemed somewhat pointless to keep it on AfD. Computerjoe's talk 11:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. Although you participated in the conversation and decided keep. I scratched your name out and used mine. I'll take the heat on it. SynergeticMaggot 16:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Can a user just take a closure and the heat? While I appreciate the thought, I can face the heat like I have so many times before :) Computerjoe's talk 17:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. Although you participated in the conversation and decided keep. I scratched your name out and used mine. I'll take the heat on it. SynergeticMaggot 16:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
RfA
I nominated you at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Computerjoe (4) Geo. 21:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I have to decline. I do not yet feel that I have addressed concerns in my last RfA. Computerjoe's talk 21:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Civility
Why do you think it's incivil? Just because I question any effectiveness of Concordia? --ElectricEye (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Do you find it incivil that I wrote "if Concordia and ComputerJoe won't competently build it up in a positive and effective direction" Explain why you think it is incivil. --ElectricEye (talk) 21:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- It reads somewhat uncivil, no need to make a big deal out of it. Just my opinion :) Computerjoe's talk 09:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Advocacy request
Heyo, Steve Caruso here. There is a Request for assistance by MathStatWoman (talk) on Daniel H. Wagner, Associates, Marion Cohen, Roberta Wenocur, Elaine Zanutto, User: MxM Peace. Would you be willing to take their case? If you will, please leave a note and sign under the entry on WP:AMARQ and change "(pending)" in the heading to "(open)." When you're finished with the case, set it to "(closed)". If you're not able to take the case, please leave me a message on my talk page so I can continue searching for a willing Advocate. Many thanks! This case looks like it is going to be a bit sensitive as the user, MathStatWoman appears to be knowledgeable but does not have very much experience editing articles or using the software (under 400 edits since mid-December last year). She may need to be walked through some Policy so that she can better understand it. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 15:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 28th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 35 | 28 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Assistance is futile
Hey, non-direct-WP question, is Freenode up? Computerjoe's talk 15:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looks ok to me. Someone just asked "Am I here?!" so might have only just come back (but I was never knocked off, though I was idling) Petros471 15:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm on now :) Computerjoe's talk 15:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Bootcamp Barnstar
Hi Computerjoe, I can assure you theres no copyvio here :). I've left the info on the page here[2], including a link to the original image, with 'permission granted' copyright notice ;) 'slater --Deon555talkReview 01:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Concerning VandalProof
Hey Joe, you approved me to use VandalProof as of 15:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC), yet I cannot log on. The only conclusion I came to is that this was because I was not on the Approval page. Help? --Reaper X 02:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- And Reaper X is now listed in the Approved list twice, weird. --Sully 16:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Translation complete
Hello, I finished the translation from Hebrew of Disputation of Tortosa. I left the original text at the bottom because I did not know whether to delete it or if it's worth merging. nadav 03:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Foundry model
There's a merge discussion at Talk:Foundry model. RJFJR 17:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof
Hi. I put my name on the Awaiting Approval list for VandalProof about a week ago and it doesn't seem like any moderators have checked the page since then. No rush, Just checking in because the page says to check back if I don't hear anything in 24 hours. Thanks.
--דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 talk contribs Count 01:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanx for reply
No at all, If you think that this time it is not suitable for me to use VP, then i will try to get some more expierence and will apply again in some time. regards. phippi46 12:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
If you're on...
If you are on still on, please approve me for VandalProof. I was accidenally removed by another editor, and I had to readd my username to the list. Hello32020 12:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Splendid new idea
Thank you for your timely suggestion. Here we go: the next time somebody (about whom I shall of course AGF) deletes a wodge of an article and replaces it with "You're fucking gay", I shall consider writing on his (somehow I think of all these IPs as male) talk page no mention of "moronic" but on the contrary: "Certain that you are a homo sapiens, [blah blah blah]".
You write: This editor uses Mozilla Firefox to edit the Wikipedia on Windows XP, or sometimes if he feels like it Windows Vista! Well, if that's your thing. Me, I'm delighted to be shot of MS. I've just installed Kubuntu. -- Hoary 14:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Approved to use Vandalproof?
It appears that you have approved me (and a large number of others) to use Vandalproof but Vandalproof appears not to recognise that I'm approved. When you approved myself it appears that Vandalproof ran out of space in the edit summary [3] and I've also not received a message on my talk page. Looking at a packet trace the last 500 edit history entries are the only page VP is accessing on startup so I'm wondering whether this truncation is causing approvals to possibly not be recognized? --Sully 17:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
HI there
I have a question. You did not approv my request to use VP earlier, i m wondering as I noticed later that in order to get VP approval a editor must have atleast 250 edits counts, at the time I had less then 250 edits counts, now I want to know can I apply again ? with more then 250 edits counts. pls reply phippi46 13:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ok thanx alot, I've got it. regards phippi46 15:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 5th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 36 | 5 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
V for Vendetta
How can comparing the simialrities between the BNP and the right wing facist party in V be POV?(Halbared 17:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC))
- My main complaint is the fact you are comparing it along with the Nazi party. I don't think the BNP are quite Nazis :P Computerjoe's talk 17:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I would conccur...but I am not comapring the Nazis to the BNP (though know knows what they could grow to), but that the party in the book/film has it's origins in the British Nationalist Party, as well as the NAZIs. The book was written in the early 80's. We were coming out of the 70's which was a huge time for the BNP and the 'bovver boot' brigrade. The BNP were at a high point back then, they were an influence on the book, which is my point:op.(Halbared 17:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC))
- Can you provide sources for that, please? Computerjoe's talk 17:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I would conccur...but I am not comapring the Nazis to the BNP (though know knows what they could grow to), but that the party in the book/film has it's origins in the British Nationalist Party, as well as the NAZIs. The book was written in the early 80's. We were coming out of the 70's which was a huge time for the BNP and the 'bovver boot' brigrade. The BNP were at a high point back then, they were an influence on the book, which is my point:op.(Halbared 17:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC))
Constantin Rosetti
based on NLWIKI. Babel fish or do you speak Dutch? ;). Al (writer of the NL article C. Rosetti). 82.171.215.71 17:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Babel fish and my basic German helped :P Computerjoe's talk 18:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
cleanup taskforce
I just tagged Software prototyping for the taskforce. First thing to do is to determine what needs to be done. (For a start, it's probably too long). Could you take a look at the article and leave notes at /Software prototyping about your opinion of the article, please? Thank you. RJFJR 13:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. I removed the references from the headings (item1). I'mm trying to figure out how to reduce the number of headings. I don't know what kind of picture would go with this article. RJFJR 16:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you and help please
Thank you for commenting that I need not leave Wikipedia, and inviting me to contribute again, but this is what happened, and I am intimidated and frustrated:
I had truly planned to stop editing Wikipedia. Yet due to some kind words and encouragement from Wikipedians like you, I tried, timidly, to return.
This is what transpired: I always sign in, even when reading articles. I had been reading articles on the Riemann hypothesis and the zeta function, when I was alerted that there were messages on my talk page. There were several messages advising me not to stop editing and an offer to discuss the content of proposed new articles with other editors. Therefore, I decided to attempt to contribute again.
The response was that User: Chris53516 vandalized my discussion/talk page and sent me at least two messages (and I quote) that I was guilty of "dishonesty" (this was posted on a vandalized version of my discussion/talk page) and was a "liar" (posted on User: Chris53516's own page), simply because I had decided to contribute to Wikipedia again.
Moreover, I am not a "sockpuppet" nor a "sockpuppet master". I always sign in, and I always use the same user name. I do not at all appreciate this nomenclature on my user page; it is an insult, implying that I am using underhanded, sneaky means of editing via aliases. I do not do so. I share a computer and a network. Strangely, I have been accused of being the "sockpuppet" of people who have different IP addresses, whom I have never met. On Wikipedia, is it standard to be assumed guilty without proof? to be assumed guilty until proven innocent? to be assumed guilty without an attempt to be proven innocent?
Hence, it seems, that I am truly disliked on Wikipedia and that the way to settle disputes, for me at least, is to leave. If you think otherwise, look at what happened to my discussion/talk page, due to User: Chris53516 who was aided by User: Chan-Ho Suh in restoring my talk/discussion page. This is ironic since User: Chris53516 urges Wikipedians to "be nice". Hence, in my attempt to contribute to Wikipedia again, I have confirmation that it is indeed an unpleasant and frustrating experience, and ruled by those who have a different concept of "being nice".
However, I would like answers to my questions above, so I truly understand how Wikipedia operates.
To review and summarize, the questions I would like answered are these:
1. Should I not sign in when reading other articles, so that I do not see alerts that I have messages?
2. If it is acceptable for me to sign in when reading other articles, is it all right for me to re-join Wikipedia, even after I thought I would stop editing, after having been encouraged to do so by other Wikipedians?
3. If it is indeed acceptable for me to decide to edit again, am I really "dishonest" and a "liar" as per User: Chris53516?
4. Is it appropriate for Wikipedians such as User: Chris53516 and User: Chan-Ho Suh and others (anonymous) to vandalize my discussion/talk page by deleting favorable comments while adding their own verbiage including terms that, in my opinion, are insulting and, moreover, false?
5. Why am I being accused of "sockpuppetry" when it is not true, and cannot be proven simply because it is not true?
6. Why is the accusation of "sockpuppetry" displayed on my User page? I really do not appreciate this, especially since it is a false accusation.
7. What does "be nice" mean on Wikipedia, as User: Chris53516 recommends ? Does it include calling another Wikipedian "dishonest", someone who intends to "deceive", and a "liar" if that Wikipedian decides to return to Wikipedia and attempt to communicate with others via talk, or to edit an article?
8. Why had so many of my articles been deleted? So many of my edits reverted? Even when I supplied citations? (Some of the articles I started became quite lengthy, although they were intended to be concise, simply because of so many requests to establish importance of the subject, noteability, to provide more and more citations even after having supplied many, etc.)
9. If you do indeed answer my questions, and if I should respond to your answering me, shall I anticipate being called "liar", "dishonest", "sockpuppet" that I "deceive", etc (by other Wikipedians, of course, not by you!) Again, thank you.
But now you might have an idea why (a) I had decided to leave Wikipedia, and (b) was concerned about trying to re-join and edit again.
I suspect that this experience that I have had on Wikipedia has affected other Wikipedians, probably who are people with valuable information to contribute, but who have decided to stop creating articles or to edit because of similar experiences. This would lead to an incomplete and inconsistent encyclopedia, which is not what Wikipedia should be.
Sorry for the long message, but Wikipedia is an internet phenomenon, and these issues are important, to me and to others, including students in university, grade school, and high school.
Moreover, I had wanted to use my time to contribute actual content and learning more about the markup language: articles about topics in maths and stats, bios of persons, and other topics that interest me; i.e., spend my time on useful endeavors for Wikipedia, not being involved with disagreements nor wasting time on matters such as these.
Thank you again. MathStatWoman 09:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Software prototyping
I did work on Software prototyping. Am I going in the right direction? RJFJR 18:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Editor Review
Hi! You may not have noticed, but some changes have been made and discussed at the WP:ER talk page. Your input would be very welcome.
In particular, what do you think of my suggestion for a simple input field to make it easier for new users to create a correctly-named template page? Try it out and tell us what you think. :) Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 01:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Editor Review
Hi Computerjoe, I see a few days ago, you edited (and archived the Editor Reviews([4])). Next time, try to actually _archive_ it in to the archives page. Not being mean or anything,, but yeah, I just wondered where my Editor Review went. See ya round ;) --Deon555talkReview 23:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the note. I'd be happy to categorise them, if you don't have anyone else for the job :) --Deon555talkReview 08:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 11th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 37 | 11 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| Carnildo resysopped | Report from the Hungarian Wikipedia |
| News and notes | Features and admins |
| Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Biography Newsletter September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. plange 00:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
My RFA
Thank you, Computerjoe, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. Now that I have the mop (which I've handled a few times at Wikinews, as you noticed), I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. That means if you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —this is messedrocker (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof
What is the difference between Mainstream edits and article edits? Aazn 20:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC). Also: I changed my javascript to add the new heading at the end, instead of the top.
- There isn't a difference. The term is mainspace, btw, not mainstream. Computerjoe's talk 20:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
what??
Dear computerjoe, what do you not like about my posts that you called "personal attacks"? please cite a reference instead of confusing the hell out of me. 66.90.182.183 09:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof
Dear Computerjoe
Thank you for the message you left on my User Page. I was overjoyed to learn that there was nothing personal in your decision to decline my application for VP. I've been reverting vandalism on the Bob Dylan page for two years, and recently took this article to FA status. Can you tell me how many mainspace edits one needs to qualify for VP, and what my currently tally is? With warmest best wishes Mick gold 21:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm interested in this also. Thanks for the note! Best,--Amerique 23:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- You say 250. How many have I done? (I'm afraid I'm not as computer literate as you are, Computerjoe.) best wishes Mick gold 07:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Computerjoe. I hope I prove adept at using it. :-) Mick gold 10:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Here you go
Thanks Joe here is the case. Nikola Smolenski on a wikiproject that was deleted by User:Xoloz. MfD was done to get rid of it. Æon Insanity Now!EA! 19:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Please vote
Hello, there. Please take the time to vote for the various candidates over at Core_biographies#Voting_booth. If you can, try to read a bit about the candidates you don't know about so you can get a better idea of how to vote. Thanks! ♠ SG →Talk 10:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 18th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 38 | 18 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Use of english
To be honest,I feel ridiculous to communicate on english with people who have the same mother language like myself.Especially when it has nothing to do with Wikipedia on english. CrniBombarder!!! (†) 20:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
AMA Request
Hello and thank you, though I guess I might becoming a little boring :( The page was at Wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias and the deletion debate is at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias. There are also a few related pages (WP:CASB, Wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias/Logo and Wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias/Recognising propaganda) which are non-controversial - if the central project stays, all should stay, if it goes they serve no purpose. Nikola 13:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- I always use English, but if someone starts in Serbian I continue in Serbian. Do you think that it would be a bad idea if I would recreate the page as a subpage at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Serbia? (Note that several users, including the nominator for deletion, suggested that in the discussion). Nikola 13:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well I suppose there is nothing to be done anymore? Thank you for helping me anyway :) Nikola 17:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
The Halo's RfA
|
Computerjoe... Thank you very much for your support in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your support. Computerjoe, thanks for the support. Hearing you say that you think I’m a good user is fantastic, and I hope that I can now become an even better editor. Yours, Thε Halo Θ 22:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC) |
Software prototyping
I need some more feedback on Software prototyping. Basically I'm stuck, even though I know it can be improved. Thank you. RJFJR 16:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Maquis raider.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maquis raider.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks
 |
Hi, Computerjoe, and thanks for your comments in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for September 25th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 39 | 25 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
