Talk:Computer-aided software engineering
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Popularity of CASE
Why haven't we taken to == CASE == the way we took to third generation language, to micro-computers, or to computing in general?
Interesting question, but perhaps not one that this Wikipedia article should try to answer. This kind of historical analysis is likely to raise controversy and POV. Getting a useful and balanced article describing the facts alone is hard enough. --RichardVeryard 07:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] the same article
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Computer-aided%20software%20engineering
[edit] Criterion for listing of CASE tools
I wonder what was the criterion used to list some CASE tools. By taking a look at the list as it is now (Feb 8 2005), some reader could get the impression that the list is somewhat exhaustive, or that all CASE tools are commercial, closed source.
Of course, there are lots of alternatives in the free software/open source worlds, not worth mentioning becaues they are inmature, or just poor quality alternatives. However there are some others that deserve attention: attention from the readers. I would particularly like to suggest the addition of ArgoUML.
[edit] Missing content here!
I see nothing about CASE as used to create and track requirements as they relate to a test script/plan. CASE is also quite important in that regard. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering#Process_and_methodology
Don't forget the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) - requirements analysis is very important.
[edit] Architecture of Page
This page needs to be structured better. However, I think that Stimpy's change kinda sticks out like a sore thumb when it is basically the only section on the page. --Whiteknox 14:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] More pages
Someone should spin off pages for upper CASE, lower CASE, and I-CASE, at least in my opinion. At any rate they should be extended. This article is lacking in material, especially considering the breadth of its subject and its influence on software development. --Whiteknox 14:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
