User talk:Colipon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
please post new messages on the bottom of page
 |
This User Page discussion is currently being vandalized. For recent news on this topic, see WP:NPA, and a new notice up at WP:PAIN. Insults may change rapidly as the event progresses. |
For those of you that keep vandalizing my page, please feel free to continue to do so. I do not know what I said that triggered this vandalism, so if you wish to explain in civilized terms, I will be happy to receive you.
你这个没有教养的狗崽子，想骂我就骂吧。爱怎么骂怎么骂！ 你是UBC的学生吧。
Contents |
Falun Gong Sarcasm
- OK as long as you were being sarcastic I withdraw my comments. Jsw663 06:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- PS Is mediation even possible for an entry about Falun Gong? Given the controversy, I don't think true mediation is possible, regardless of whether you ask the ArbCom, the MedCab or any other party. Think about it - how many people can have truly neutral views on both the CCP and FLG, as well as have a relatively centrist political inclination (ie not pro- or anti- human rights / 'freedom of religion') and not be involved in the matter in some way (eg through ethnicity) yet be sufficiently knowledgeable? Jsw663 06:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
In response to your questions
1)I've studied Falun Gong in North America and in Taiwan (I currently live in Taiwan), but not in Mainland China. 2)As much as I know about the inner workings of the CCP, which is a fair amount, I certainly know a lot more about the inner workings of Falun Gong practitioners. 3)I would say that I know Mao's background better than Mr.Li's. There's a whole lot more info available on Mao than on Mr. Li.
4)I've taken undergraduate courses on Chinese history, art, religion, and poli sci. I've also done a fair amount of research on my own. I've written papers on the Taiping Rebellion, so I'm quite familiar with it (and I think Falun Gong is rather different). I'm also quite familiar with the Korean Tonghak rebellion, which is often compared with the Taiping Rebellion.
Hope that answers your questions --Mcconn 15:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I feel sorry for you, Communist dog.
You can never ever assimilate in Western culture, all the years of brainwashing in hte Mainland ensured that is so. When will you ever get out of the box? Think outside the box- you heard of that???????? Chinese people are so dumb.........
- Be responsible of what you say! You should not confuse a single person with the whole ethnic group. Although Colipon is dumb, that does NOT mean that all Chinese people are dumb. You could be accused of racism.
-
- Next time, at least sign your comments so I can hear why I'm such a dumb person. Colipon+(T) 00:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Arbcom
Informal mediator WikieZach| talk is preparing to move the Falun Gong mediation case to the Wikipedia:Arbcom. I have been asked to alert concerned (to the best of my knowledge) editors about this matter. Thank you. --Fire Star 火星 23:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism removed
User:MAOZEcriminAL vandalised your user page, so I reverted it as you were away at the time. I left his jibe on your talk page though, as I thought you might get a kick out of it or something. John Smith's 11:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Semi-protection
If you would like, your user talk page can be protected from editing by IPs. —Centrx→talk • 18:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:1996 Leaders of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation Leaders’ Forum
Template:1996 Leaders of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation Leaders’ Forum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 10:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Falun Gong mediation
Hello, I'm sorry it's been awhile, but I recently agreed to mediate that case. I don't know if it's a stale issue, so it would be good if a few of you let me know whether or not mediation is still needed. Since there are so many of you, I'm going to assume that all of you agree to me mediating until and unless I am told otherwise. I'm also going to assume public mediation is fine, unless someone asks for private mediation, or I come to think private mediation might be better. I would, however, appreciate it if you just said something there to let me know if you are still around. Also, assuming you are still interested in mediation, please watchlist the page if you haven't already. Thanks! Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 02:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
