Talk:Coat of arms of England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coat of arms of England is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ).

King Richard II of England's arms? IP Address 13:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Why did Henry not add Ireland to the royal arms? Was there a dispute with the King of Scots, over Edward Bruce's legacy? IP Address 13:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A question about the England football badge, crest or coat of arms.

Why are there ten red and white roses on the England football crest? Know body knows, do you? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.153.247.72 (talk • contribs) 15:07, June 24, 2006.

The red and white rose is a royal badge for England (originally of the Tudors). —Tamfang 01:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
See Tudor rose.--Hannesde Correct me! 12:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are there any similarities between the english and the swabian Hohenstaufen arms ?

Have there been any relations between Hohenstaufen and England ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.128.235.222 (talk • contribs) 21:13, July 16, 2006.

[edit] England - Normandy - Denmark?

Its known that Normandy is named after a the norse, danish king as always been using tree lions, is it possible that then the norse possede normandy they also brought along their coats of arms, as they did in Tallinn Schleswig-Holstein Schleswig and Lûneburg. Could the english coats of arms be a version of the danish, from a time then the design where not fixed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.198.210.66 (talk • contribs) 15:42, August 17, 2006.

The trouble is that there were Normans in Gaul for two centuries before the earliest trace of what we'd call heraldry. There's no shield with three lions on the Bayeux Tapestry. —Tamfang 23:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It's potentially true but it's so long before the invasion it's hardly worth mentioning. R johnson 12:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • We're talking about a system in which some symbols are known to have endured eight centuries; their continuity for a few centuries before that, if it could be established, would certainly be worth mentioning. —Tamfang 08:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)