User talk:CmdrClow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello CmdrClow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Bushytails 21:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Images

Finally! Someone edits the pages and puts the actual true images of Anakin's spirit on ROTJ! The Wookieepedian 09:26, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nice Work!

Thanks, man!! Cool contribs in the Animated Batman article. --T-man, the wise 03:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk Page

Changing people's comments Editing signed comments by another user to substantially change their meaning (e.g. turning someone's vote around), except when removing a personal attack (which is somewhat controversial in and of itself). Signifying that a comment is unsigned is an exception. e.g. (unsigned comment from user). Please see Wikipedia: Vandalism for further comparison. Bignole 23:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism

Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, or deleting entire sections thereof, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors. These are considered warnings, please do not remove them again. Also, I have seen your history, and removing warnings about your image tags is also prohibited. If you continue to remove warnings I will be forced to report you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#Types_of_vandalism Bignole 13:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I was "blocked" for "vandalism" by an admin that didn't like me editing his stuff. I was immediately unblocked and he was reprimanded for what he did, because it was against Admin policy to intentionally block someone just so they cannot edit a page. Please read all comments about that situation before you try and use them to justify your actions. These are not personal attacks, they are warnings. If you remove them again I will report you. If you have a problem with the warnings than please feel free to contact a mediator, or admin, so that they can see the warnings and the changes you made. Thank you. Bignole 02:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again.

I removed the warnings by this user because I interpret them as personal attacks. The warnings Bignole has given me are for the express purpose of attempting to provoke me. Because they are interpreted as personal attacks and talk page vandalism, they were removed. BIGNOLE, MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ME AGAIN. CmdrClow 03:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Greetings. I have come to your user talk page from Wikipedia:Requests for investigation on which Bignole has filed a report about the conflict between the two of you. After looking at the contributions of you both, I have decided only to remind you that while pages in your userspace are for your own use, the conversation on them pertaining to discouraging other users from certains of conduct, as mentioned above in Bignole's messages, is prohibited and an offence for which one can be banned. As these events happened about three weeks ago, I assume that you have cooled down from the conflict and do not see any further repurcussions from the events that took place back then. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, accessible by clicking the "Talk" link in my signature. Thanks, ZsinjTalk 23:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:What?

Everybody in the photo were members of the League at some point.

No, they weren't. I can't remember Arsenal, Cyborg, Karate Kid, Dr Mid-Nite, Black Lightning, Donna Troy, Question (may I stop?) as JL members.

Just leave it, its a high quality photo. The Jimenez photo is way out of date (just look at Batman's costume), and Bene's art is a good representation of the good characters of the DCU.

I really think it's a great image. But it's portraiting characters non-related to the League. Therefore, it does not suits the article.

Plus, there are people in the Jimenez photo who haven't been members of the league either. Just leave it.

All the characters portraited in Jimenez pic were related to the League at some point. Assistants, unofficial and honorary members. —Lesfer (talk/@) 04:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Batman_Animated.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Batman_Animated.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DX Logo

The one I'm posting is the real logo... the one that you keep putting there isn't the real logo.

I don't care. It's just Wikipedia. Plus I'm posting the real DX logo, not a fake DX logo.

How am I vandalizing pages? I'm just putting the REAL logo on the page!

THAT IS NOT MY OPINION. I AM PUTTING THE REAL LOGO ON THE PAGE. THE LOGO I'M PUTING ON THE PAGE IS THE LOGO WWE USES. THE LOGO YOU PUT ON WITH "BETTER QUALITY" IS SOMEWHAT OF THE REAL LOGO, BUT NOT COMPLETELY.

The logo that was featured on the Vengeance poster had like spray paint around it but this one doesn't. Just take a look at the image I'm trying to put up and the one you guys keep putting up. They look different and the one I've been putting up is the correct looking image. But whatever I'm sick of fighting about it. Just keep you're image up. It's not worth getting kicked off for, because I'm not going to win this anyway so I might as well stop trying to put the real logo up.

[edit] Respect

I respect you as a fellow wikipedian and human. You are looking out for the good of wikipedia as I am. Thanks.

--Mikedk9109 00:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RamistheMan

I have reported him to two different admins. So he will be block from editing soon.

--Mikedk9109 00:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not Notable DVD notes

Once again, the information in each WrestleMania article as well as other professional wrestling event articles is based on the event itself NOT any sort of irrelevant influences such DVD releases as per WP:PW. After all, the articles are not titled "WrestleMania X8 DVD". If you would like to add any sort of information regarding the differences between the events and the DVDs or Video releases please do so in a section already provided for you in the main WrestleMania article here. Once again please do not add information that is not notable to the PPV. The section for that sort of information has been provided already. Thank you. -- 3:16 16:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Retirement

Hey, just stopped by to say I am retiring today. Just see my user page for reasoning. Thanks.

--Mikedk9109 19:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Batwoman OYL

Hey, please don't put spec in articles. Yes, Batwoman's on JLA #1 (one of the covers), but so is Booster and he's dead. Until she shows up in the pages of an OYL comic, your edits are pure speculation and don't belong in wikipedia articles. Yet. Give it a month more and I believe we'll know. I hope so ... Viva Batwoman! -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 11:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

It's still spec. Covers aren't the same as someone showing up in the issue, and Supergirl's on that cover and they voted no on her. So is Green Arrow, who won't be in the JLA right now. Flash (Bart) may be in the new one. I'm not arguing that she's not alive, I'm arguing that until we see her inside the issue, it's not fact. It's speculation. There's a difference. Also, Please sign your posts on talk pages. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 17:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
It's NOT spec, Brad Meltzer himself has said that everyone who appears on that cover is considered for JL membership. I didn't say anything more than that, which makes it completely and irrevocably true. It is fact, straight from the horse's mouth. CmdrClow 18:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
They're considered. You said it yourself. That doesn't mean she'll be in JLA, nor does it confirm she's alive. Yes, Brad said they're considered for membership. Cite that article as your source, not the cover, and also, double check what he said. He may mean 'Everyone on the cover is someone I the comic guy want to consider for the JLA' which isn't the same as 'Everyone on the cover will be voted on by Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman.' If she's JLA, then your sources are spoilers, and should be tagged. It's safer and prudent to wait a couple weeks until we know for sure. Until then, we don't have the full story and it's speculation to assume that she's alive.
My stance: Until we see Batwoman, alive and well, inside the pages of the comic and in the 'now' of the comic world, it's presumptious to assume that she's alive and will be voted on to be in the JLA.
I happen to think you're right, but the only proof we have is a cover (of which earlier versions showed dead folks) and an interview that remains uncited. The one I found with mention of Batwoman was this and I didn't see what you're referring to. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying you're too early. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 19:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm not being 'holier than thou' - I'm telling you that JLA cover was not a good source for your spec, and therefor it was spec. And as I repeated a dozen times, if you'd be patient and wait you'd get the proof you (and I) wanted. And look! It was there in Detective comics, and I not only saw it was in the article, but I cleaned it up and made it clear. That's all I was asking for, and look, we got it. Please read Wikipedia is not a crystal ball so that next time, you can understand why I'm saying it the way I am. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 02:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Superman Films

Nevertheless...

1: Using posters does appear to be the standard on Wikipedia. And the earliest of the films was from '78, not exactly old.
2: The more posterish images should still be preserved on their respective pages.
Spencer "The Belldog" Bermudez | (Complain here) 08:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Batman #1

Feel free to talk out the Batman #1 issue on the talk page of The Dark Knight. Could be a relevant discussion for the future about how to note influences that are mentioned by primary sources or implied by secondary sources. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 14:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for talking it out on the talk page. I went over to Talk:Batwoman to see what Ace was talking about, though... Jesus! I'm glad you didn't bring that kind of attitude over to The Dark Knight. Anyway, kudos. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 11:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rino1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rino1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 00:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IfD

Would you please post on your IfD nomination for Image:Rklawton.JPG a link to the policy which this image violates? This would help the discussion considerably given your claim that this image violates policy. Rklawton 15:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Per [1], there is no record on your user page or your talk page that indicates you were denied the ability to upload an image for your user page. None. Zip. Zilch. To correct your mistake, I think you should go to the IfD page and retract your nomination of my image - since you had zero grounds for doing so. Rklawton 03:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I suggest reading WP:CIVIL - if you can't follow those rules, you won't be allowed to play here. Now, are you suggesting then that we should delete my image and just take your word for it that somehow, somewhere, it is against the rules, rules no one else seems to be able to find? That's no way to run an encyclopedia. Now, might you be referring to this edit?[2] Rklawton 14:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 28 June

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in 28 June. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --CalendarWatcher 14:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

CmdrClow believes that Superman has a place in date articles, and he is correct. However, this particular movie sequel release does not have such a place. I've made a quick review and removed other sequel releases from date articles as per CmdrClow's suggestion. Rklawton 14:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:DXlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DXlogo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Supbat1a.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Supbat1a.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/m/d/User_talk%7ECmdrClow_2bea.html"